Academia blaming men for climate change

rh1

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
17,183
Reaction score
19,827
Location
Somewhere close to you
This was in the Tygerburger dated 13 May 2026:
IMG_20260514_114138_583.jpg

I have taken the pic twic, both in landscape and in portrait. It automatically rotates when uploading:

Screenshot_20260514_114408_Gallery.jpg
 
89% of Fortune 500 company CEO's are men. Am guessing that a lot of those men are in control of policies that might contribute to climate change. Pointing this out doesn't sound like misandry to me.

For those wanting to actually read the paper before taking offence.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18902138.2025.2576458
 
The paper argues that masculinity is deeply connected to environmental destruction, climate change, and unsustainable economic systems. It is an editorial introduction to a special issue in the journal NORMA: The International Journal for Masculinity Studies focused on men, masculinity, and the Anthropocene (“the age of human impact on Earth”).

Key points:

  • Men, on average, consume more carbon-intensive goods and engage more in environmentally damaging behaviors than women.
  • Traditional masculine norms — dominance, competition, control over nature, heavy consumption, aggression, fossil-fuel culture, meat consumption, large vehicles, etc. — are framed as contributing factors to ecological crises.
  • The authors argue environmental destruction is not just a technological or economic problem, but also a social and cultural one tied to gender systems and power structures.
  • They use the term “(M)Anthropocene” to emphasize that ecological damage has disproportionately been driven by male-dominated political, industrial, and economic systems.
  • The paper links patriarchy, capitalism, colonialism, militarism, and extractive industries as interconnected systems.
  • It also discusses how climate denial and resistance to environmental policies are sometimes associated with certain masculine identities and political movements.
  • The issue explores alternatives, including “eco-masculinities” — forms of masculinity centered around care, sustainability, cooperation, and environmental responsibility.
The article itself is mainly a conceptual/editorial overview rather than a hard-science experimental paper with original lab data. It summarizes themes and directions for the broader special issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rh1
89% of Fortune 500 company CEO's are men. Am guessing that a lot of those men are in control of policies that might contribute to climate change. Pointing this out doesn't sound like misandry to me.

For those wanting to actually read the paper before taking offence.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18902138.2025.2576458
But you forget that the only reason men don't just sit under a tree drinking beer is because they want to impress women. That's were ALL the problems start.
 
There is no doubt ... I fart way more than my goose.
And every...single...one is a hummer of note.

Your goose likely pretends she needs to leave the room before she vents. You check out tik tok on farts - and sharting :)
 
89% of Fortune 500 company CEO's are men. Am guessing that a lot of those men are in control of policies that might contribute to climate change. Pointing this out doesn't sound like misandry to me.

For those wanting to actually read the paper before taking offence.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/18902138.2025.2576458

Yeah, but 100% of those companies are owned by shareholders - so we should do a look-through to establish the correct demographic ;)
 
My favourite part of the study is this sentence:

The prefix ‘m’ highlights that the destructive ecological and social processes are associated with and largely driven by the activities of privileged eurowestern countries, particularly elite white men
Then when you actually take a look at who the big polluters are China makes the rest of the planet look like amateurs...

all those evil white Chinese men...
 
Your goose likely pretends she needs to leave the room before she vents. You check out tik tok on farts - and sharting :)
She assures me she is not one of those girls and never farts.
But now that you mention leaving the room, every living creature leaves when I drop a dart if it wants any chance of survival. I actually feel sorry for the poor potplants.
My contribution to global warming is 10x that of any chick on the planet... even the tik tok baffers
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rh1
My favourite part of the study is this sentence:


Then when you actually take a look at who the big polluters are China makes the rest of the planet look like amateurs...

all those evil white Chinese men...
Yeah this is just anti male slop. Give us some real science.

The article itself is mainly a conceptual/editorial overview rather than a hard-science experimental paper with original lab data. It summarizes themes and directions for the broader special issue.
 
I also have a study that says its all woman's fault for having so many children. If they stopped we wouldn't have any global warming within a generation.
 
Insinuates the very nature and attributes of masculinity that lead them to be in leadership roles are to blame for choices that cause climate change and by extension inferring that femininity would be immune to making the same decisions.

Firstly.
The type of men who become CEOs, they are a very specific subset of male population.
Almost psychopathic obsession with work. Which when you consider the greater variability nature of men.
Of course, more psychopathically obsessed men would exist and by extension of course more CEOs would be men.
Estimations have CEOs at up to 20% of them have psychopathic tendencies.

Much higher than the % in general population of men. Much much higher % than women.

2nd when you look bigger picture.
When you also consider the reasons why heavy industry fossil fuels were pushed in the 19th and early 20th century.
Life was hard; you would not have the time to sit and write nonsense like this because you would be busy refilling your whale oil lamp and hand washing your laundry in cold water while hoping your husband or father comes back with all his limbs intact from his current whaling expedition if he comes back at all.

All these heavy industries have afforded the writer a very comfortable life they now enjoy, because the abundance of energy has allowed the world to be tamed largely to such an extent in our daily lives. We have free time to waste of frivolous activities. We have to go to the gym to work out because food is so abundant, and everyday chores are so easy we need to consciously work at keeping our weight under control. Placing blame on masculinity and men with no acknowledgement of the men who died over the centuries working to tame the world and it's not a men vs women thing, both men and women worked and suffered together to get the world to the state it is today.

Sitting there enjoying all the benefits of a world tamed by heavy industries while at the same time wanting to blame men for creating the very industries that had tamed the world.

Hubris.

This sort of rhetoric is the same arrogance as the attitude from 1st world nations trying to lecture and bar developing nations from using the same cheap and abundant energy sources that 1st world nations had used to get themselves in their current state of development.

Could also make the same broad speculation about women and birth control medication in wastewater reaching water sources polluting the water with estradiol, causing male fish and frogs to revert to females.

Whatever.

 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X