Actual e-toll costs based on compliance...

DJ...

Banned
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
70,285
Reaction score
3,556
Location
Gauteng
So I have reworked my previous calculations to better reflect the actual cost environment at Sanral, and while I have been generous in their margin, I have been fair and based my info on actual disclosures. These calculations take costs into account based on disclosures, but it is clear that these costs are understated by a massive amount, but we will use them nonetheless. I have also included a small side-calculation to show the figures Sanral claim we will be paying, as a comparison:

So, want to know what e-tolls will actually cost you, and what it will take to bring the system down? Here it is:

Scenario 1:

This calculation shows the scenario should e-tolling achieve 100% compliance of all registered Gauteng vehicles:

100_compliance1.png


As can be seen, with 100% compliance, every road user will have to pay in the region of R170 per month for e-tolls. We know that 100% compliance is not possible as there are numerous exemptions, people will refuse to pay, and many will find alternative routes or modes of transport.

Scenario 2:

This calculation assumes a 66% compliance rate, meaning 2 000 000 users actually pay every single month:

66_compliance1.png


In this scenario, all 2 million road users willing to pay will need to pay on average, around R260 per month for e-tolls...

Scenario 3:

This calculation assumes a 33% compliance rate, meaning that 1 000 000 road users will pay every single month. From where I stand, this is a more likely scenario and is perhaps a little on the high side...

33_compliance1.png


In this scenario, all paying road users will be required to pay, on average, around R510 per month in order for Sanral to pay its debt. This is quite clearly not realistic on their part to expect such a ludicrously high monthly payment.

It is quite clear that Sanral require upwards of a 66% compliance rate in order for them to simply trade solvently and to avoid a default on their debt. A default will render all outstanding debt liable at that date, including all interest/coupon components, so they will be hellbent on avoiding this, particularly in light of the fact that government has guaranteed about 60% of this debt.

It is therefore imperative that at least one out of every three people you know boycotts e-toll payments, or delays their payment for as long as legally possible. Personally, I will not be paying.

What is alarming is that if we simply delay our payments for as long as possible, it appears (based on some research that I've done into the bond maturities) that Sanral might in fact survive. Their bond yields will spike and this won't be good for them or government, but they can survive, especially if Treasury decide to donate more money their way, or underwrite any other debt on their behalf.

What is needed is a combination of boycotting the roads, boycotting of the payments on principle (this deal is as corrupt as they get), delaying payments for as long as legally possible, and spreading this information far and wide to as many South Africans as you can...

And now would you like to know why Sanral are so terrified of people not complying? Well take a look at this...

Compliance_vs_Cost_-_Sanral1.png


As soon as less than a million people comply on a monthly basis, they will be in financial ruin. The shortfall below that number is substantial as it is, but once we hit below 1 000 000 compliance, it becomes completely unmanageable. We need to make sure, now more than ever, and in the light of their threats and implementation date, that we stand up against this system in unity. Cosatu were right when they said that no issue since the inception of this government has been so widely criticised across all demographics. So don't cave in now in the final stretch. We can show government for once, that they report to US, not the other way around...
 
Last edited:
Well, not a cent from me

Nada

Nothing

Zip

F0kol

and the same goes for family and friends, i willl de-friend someone that buys e-tag,
 
Do you have figures on the payment rates of speeding fines?

i have a feeling they will be similar.
 

With SANRAL stating that all non-compliant people will be handed over to debt collection agencies, I wonder how that will further impact their income? I mean, those guys won't be working for free, in fact, I reckon they'll probably take an effectively fairly significant percentage of funds recovered.

Then with regards to going the legal route: do SANRAL get their legal fees for taking non-compliant users to court covered by someone?
 
DJ, is there a way to find out how many trucks drive on the N1 in Gauteng?

Remember that the trucks don't get discount, so I think that they will pay a much larger amount of that money - so the average car driver would need to pay less.
 
According to OUTA somewhere between the region of 50% and 75% of people do not pay their speeding fines in Gauteng.

So best case scenario SANRAL can hope for a 50% compliance rate.
:D

This will be hilarious when it fails.
 
DJ, is there a way to find out how many trucks drive on the N1 in Gauteng?

Remember that the trucks don't get discount, so I think that they will pay a much larger amount of that money - so the average car driver would need to pay less.

I calculated this figure in the official e-tolling thread last week iirc. Just go have a dig in there for those numbers...
 
I have added a compliance vs cost comparison chart to show you just how scared Sanral are of non-compliance below the 1 million mark, or even near it...

Compliance_vs_Cost_-_Sanral.png
 
And here's another nail in the coffin:

They're feeding us nonsense. And here is why:

_____________________________

Here are Sanral's quoted figures with an annual 20% increase. Expenditure adjusted upwards at 6% projected PPI, and this is assuming a 100% compliance rate...

100_compliance_Sanral_figures_20_annual_increase2.png


Seems that this is the perfect increase in order for them to repay their debt and remain solvent, without risking default on their bonds. The true increase is 17.7% year on year increase, but 20% allows for other overhead costs. The base requirement annual increase is 17.7% year on year for the next 7 years, unless they have lied about their numbers.

So if we're to believe Sanral's claims relating to costs, and their breakdown, we will be subjected to a 20% year on year increase in toll fees every year. This table shows you what you will be paying each year based on which cost bracket you fall under.

Actually this is the kind of thing that should be making its way to the news, as this is all based on data supplied by Sanral themselves. It's just not possible for them to fund the tolls using their numbers, without a 20% year on year increase for 7 years, and without a consistent 100% compliance rate, and 100% 30-day debtors book.

Now let's look at the two more realistic scenarios. If we go with 66% compliance rate, they require a 30.85% year on year increase to the tariffs over 7 years while maintaining a 100% 30-day debtors book (impossible):

66_compliance_Sanral_figures_20_annual_increase.png


And if we all buckle down and abstain, or at least most of us do, and we assume a 33% compliance rate, then they require a 53.91% year on year increase over 7 years with a 100% 30-day debtors book (impossible), plus a R7,2bn cash injection by government over the next two years:

33_compliance_Sanral_figures_20_annual_increase.png


This is the information that needs to get out. If you want to spread it far and wide, but need some clarification about what you're looking at, then feel free to ask in this thread and I'll happily explain.

But to break it down -

  • I've used Sanral's numbers. These are figures that they have quoted in parliament, in the press, and from their financial statements.
  • I have based their requirements on their existing debt obligations, as per their financial statements.
  • I have then used the numbers that Nazir Ali stated as fact - their breakdown of how many people will pay what.
  • I've then used that model to create scenarios based on compliance rates - 100%, 66%, and 33% (3 million, 2 million, and 1 million people paying each month).
  • I've then adjusted the numbers for the next 7 years (average time required until debt maturity. i.e. they need to repay all debt and interest) to show how much of an increase will be required each year for them to achieve this.
  • I've also provided a weighted average payment that all road users will be liable for. As you can see, it starts out small, but very quickly increases in order for them to remain solvent. So don't be fooled when they make statements like "e-tolls are cheap".
  • I've also broken it down into cost brackets as per Nazir Ali's statements so that you can see exactly what it is you're likely to be paying in the next few years. Basically, if you travel through more than 3 gantries in one direction per day, you will in all likelihood fall into Cost Bracket 4.


Please share this information...
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X