After-Dark Curfew For Under 16s

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
49,866
Reaction score
21,624
Location
Durbanville, Cape Town
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK...y+Curfew+For+Under+16s+In+Redruth%2C+Cornwall

The police-led scheme, called Operation Goodnight, is relying on the support of parents to ensure their children do not stay out late.

Around 600 homes in part of Redruth, west Cornwall, have received letters about the curfew - which is part of an ongoing campaign to reduce anti-social behaviour.

The letters asked parents in the Close Hill area of Redruth to ensure that their 16 year olds were off the streets by 9pm and under 10s were at home by 8pm.

The voluntary scheme is the brainchild of Redruth's neighbourhood policing team with the support of other agencies and residents.

The chairman of the local Helping Hands Residents' Association, Ann Mitchell, said before the launch: "The scheme has started to work already. There are less problems with children late at night."

Another organiser, Redruth town councillor Clive Bray, said ahead of the launch he thought more parents were already taking more responsibility for their children than before.

Neighbourhood beat manager Pc Marc Griffin said the the thrust of the police-led, multi-agency scheme was "putting the responsibility back into the family home."

Beginning tonight, multi-agency patrols will be out on the streets, talking to parents and carers of any young people found out after the curfew times.

"If it is felt that the child is at risk or remains vulnerable then referrals to other appropriate agencies will be made as necessary," said Pc Griffin.

Very interesting.

This would probably be declared unconstitutional here on the grounds of discrimination or something.

Is this just another example of the British nanny state or should we see it as parents finally taking responsibility ?
 
Who the hell is anyone to tell anyone where they can and cannot go and at what hours?

Oh wait, the apartheid state did that. Burma does that. Zimbabwe does that. Now I guess we can add Britain to the list.
 
I like it!!!

No, it's VERY bad - what they're saying is, "we can't control the crime (much of which is caused by immigrants) so to get the crime stats down decent law-abiding people must lose freedom and sit indoors cringing and hiding from barbarians instead of being able to go out and have fun or even just walk around in their own friggin neighbourhoods" ... meanwhile they're not fixing the actual cause of the problems - the criminal-minded people are STILL THERE.

This is bad on every imaginable level.
 
Last edited:
i wouldnt mind giving up some of my rights if it meant our crime was eradicated
 
These are children under the age of 16 - they don't have the same rights as older adults. If it were the case you wouldn't have a trial as a minor. Different rules apply and these children need discipline - if it isn't coming from the parents then it needs to come from the state.

Were it the case for legal adults then it would be a problem.
 
Why does CHILDREN under the age of 16 be out past say for instance at latest 8 at night?
 
Cos this is England where kids do what they want and parents either don't care, don't stop them or are in the local pub ?
 
Cos this is England where kids do what they want and parents either don't care, don't stop them or are in the local pub ?

Then I have no problem with the state stepping in where the parents are failing. Social services do it all the time, this just happens to be on a much larger scale. Ultimately its in the best interests of the kids.
 
You may be right but it does somewhat clash with your earlier comment.

A curfew for adults would force them to be at home with their kids - but the truth is the parents aren't there.

It is sad however that Councils/Government have to step in to do what the parents should be doing.
 
You may be right but it does somewhat clash with your earlier comment.

A curfew for adults would force them to be at home with their kids - but the truth is the parents aren't there.

Don't take me so literally. "Monkey see, monkey do" / "do as I say, not as I do".
 
Rights rights rights. I am getting gatvol of everyone's rights. What about the responsibilities that goes with these rights?

I have the right to freedom of movement - but I also have the responsibility to respect others' right to privacy. Etc. But that does NOT happen.

Now, if there is an over-focus on rights, but an under-focus on responsibilities - then someone needs to take action. If not the parents, then the state. Well done. We should do it as well.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X