Al Qaeda Endorsed Mccain!

Hardly surprising. You're never going to win against "terrorism" by fighting - the only hope you have is to start some form of dialogue.
 
Lol, well it wont matter for much longer, votes being cast and just needing to be counted soon :)
 
Makes sense to me ... after all, before the 39-44 War Hitler preferred Churchill because he was a war-mongering imperialist extremist whom the Nazis could show up and use as a foil to garner support for their own crusade against British imperial power.
 
“Al Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election,” read a commentary on a password-protected Islamist Web site that is closely linked to Al Qaeda and often disseminates the group’s propaganda.
Click to expand...

Wonder what McCain thinks about this. :rolleyes:
 
The Dem propaganda pamphlet says Al Qaeda wants McCain for Pres :eek:

There is no bull**** the NY wouldn't spew for Obama. I see they ignore Iraq and focus on Somalia. No mention of Clinton then too :o. Goebbels would be impressed


rwenzori said:
Hardly surprising. You're never going to win against "terrorism" by fighting - the only hope you have is to start some form of dialogue.
Click to expand...

Chamberlain FTW

I'm if you ask nicely they'll stop stoning 12 year olds to death for adultery.....
 
alanf85 said:
I'm if you ask nicely they'll stop stoning 12 year olds to death for adultery.....
Click to expand...

Yes - go nuke the place alantjie, then there'll be no more 12 year olds to get stoned to death.

PS Dialogue NOT= appeasement. Think Mandela, my boy.
 
rwenzori said:
Yes - go nuke the place alantjie, then there'll be no more 12 year olds to get stoned to death.

PS Dialogue NOT= appeasement. Think Mandela, my boy.
Click to expand...

Last time I checked dropping a bomb on an Nazi stopped him from killing any Jews, Gypsies, gay or Slavs. Talking if I recall didn't much of anything.....

So please explain to me what would you say to somebody who stones 12 year old to death?
 
alanf85 said:
So please explain to me what would you say to somebody who stones 12 year old to death?
Click to expand...

"With or without a blindfold?"

But at least there are still other 12 year olds around. I'm not sure, but I figure dying from stoning might be a tad better than dying from radiation sickness - it might be quicker.
 
Still haven't explained how "dialog" would stop it.

In fact your whole argument is let it happen because doing something about it would supposedly result in more deaths. Pity about those on the receiving end of genocide then :o
 
rwenzori said:
Wait away - I have no need of dialogue with you.
Click to expand...

perhaps it's because you know you wont change my mind. Yet you think those who stone 12 year olds can be persuaded. Interesting.....
 
alanf85 said:
perhaps it's because you know you wont change my mind. Yet you think those who stone 12 year olds can be persuaded. Interesting.....
Click to expand...

I have neither the desire nor need to change your mind, alantjie. I would have to pray long and hard to St. Jude the patron saint of lost causes, and I am atheistic anyway LOL! I'm not sure about those stoners, but the only hope your yankee heroes have long term of reducing their "terrorist" threat is to start talking and engaging. They might not get there, but they sure as hell aren't helping their cause by trying to fight them militarily. They also will not win. You would think they had learned a thing or two from Vietnam.

*sigh*

LOL!
:p
 
icyrus said:
Clever isn't it. "We can't let them kill each other! Let us kill them instead."

Sigh.
Click to expand...

Im half and half about that issue.

Im all for the clinical natural selection approach. Give all sides nukes and wait for the problem to sort itself out.

South Africa would coin it with its lead reserves.

I think the only reason Al Qaeda would endorse John McCain would be to rip him off and basically smudge his name. They want an Obama victory I take it. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X