I don’t think that I understand where you coming from - after reading up the detailed description of the mesh I provided on this thread, you could only come up with the idea to "load test" it before you believe that it works? Never mind the claims that everyone is an expert here...?
Excuse me if you find me being little bit apprehensive, but if you claim that you are part of this "educated environment" then surely you have the ability to imagine all the technical little bits and pieces of the mesh, combine them mentally into a big diagram, analyse them theoretically for technical performance and then pin-point all the areas you think that would not perform as claimed by me. Then you could have shared those thoughts in a form of a constructive criticism.
I see that it is much easier to throw mud than come up with good question. And no, I don’t want you to blow smoke up my butt.
How pity...
Iliyan.......
Theory and reality are worlds apart, how do all of us here know this, well we have read the theory and aggreed with it in principle. When put into practise, its a whole different ballgame. Regarding "load testing", well our "learned" friend, that either proves or disproves your "magic" theory. The choice of doing it or not is up to you. I can gaurantee if you said to all the guys commenting, please come around and test my "MAGIC" they would be there in a flash, but you havent invited a single "Disenter (in your eyes)" the opportunity to validate your claims. Oh yeh secondly, my car runs at 2l per 100Km, is a possible claim, do you believe it.
I am amazed that you continue to degrade anyone differing from your opinion, its business suicide (case studies: Sentech, Iburst, WISPs). If you are so proud of your achievements, GREAT, WONDERFUL, but dont blame anyone here for the way you are feeling right now. This is a public forum and you requested input, and you got it. Just because it wasnt "positive" does not mean it is bad, but your claims of proprietry this and that, and oh yeh we do but i cant say anything more, etc WELL, thats your choice.
Personally, and I think I talk for everyone that is negative, we would embrace the technology if it was HONESTLY a community network, but due to your "hidden" business and profiteering comments etc it is NOT a true community network. Yes you have to finance this etc, which no one has an issue with but the abusing of the term "community" for your financial gain is UNACCEPTABLE and I feel you may be FRAUDULENTLY presenting this to consumers.
Regarding the "experts".....mmmmmm most of us know the guys credentials, some are even core contributers to well known OPEN SOURCE platforms. So before we experience your technical abilitties, we are sorry but you fit into the "HOT AIR" club. You probably are technically very good, but seeing is believing.
Before you hit "quote" and reply, PLEASE DONT......(its weekend and I am sure your time can be better spent elsewhere)...... rather do us all a favour and go out there and prove us all wrong and get this network running. If you want input from the WUGS, well then invite people to test the network. If it rocks, then it is great and I can assure you that people will embrace it. If it fails, well then well done on getting this far.
Parting thought " If you want to run with the HOUNDS, dont p1ss like a puppy"
GOOD LUCK