Another day, another KPMG scandal

Hmm, I have questions. Is it the audit companies responsibility to independently confirm the valuation of assets on a balance sheet? Sounds like they where lied to the same way the investors where. I get that auditors are meant to find discrepancies to stop this type of thing but how far does that go without the cost of audit becoming prohibitive? The regulators clearly thought KPMG should have picked this up in the audit hence the fine but I kind of also feel for the auditors. I have done a lot of internal and external audits as an IT person and they are very reliant on the data we give them with little opportunity to independently verify what I tell or give them.
 
Hmm, I have questions. Is it the audit companies responsibility to independently confirm the valuation of assets on a balance sheet? Sounds like they where lied to the same way the investors where. I get that auditors are meant to find discrepancies to stop this type of thing but how far does that go without the cost of audit becoming prohibitive? The regulators clearly thought KPMG should have picked this up in the audit hence the fine but I kind of also feel for the auditors. I have done a lot of internal and external audits as an IT person and they are very reliant on the data we give them with little opportunity to independently verify what I tell or give them.

The auditing standards outline how and when other experts should be used when the audit firm itself does not have the resources or capabilities to perform a complex valuation, such as in the case at hand.

The auditor still then have to audit the work of the experts. If the auditor cannot do it, then the auditors isn't fit and proper to perform the audit and some other auditor with the capabilities should perform the audit engagement.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X