Another n00b question - work flow

undesign

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
9,030
Reaction score
26
Location
Cape Town
Sorry for all the questions, but the more I play the more the questions I have. :p

General observation:

I find that take lots more pictures than with my previous P&S of any given situation - this morning for instance of my baby daughter having her porridge I took about 30, of which maybe 10 are keepers, of which 3 are tack sharp, the other 7 OK. Most non-keepers are either blurred (subject movement) or out of focus (AF and MF). I tend to use large apertures so DoF, combined with shaky focusing technique is probably the culprit. :(

My point being that the sheer volume of photos have increased to a point where work flow is becoming critical to manage it all.

So my question is about work flow and any suggestions would be appreciated. Atm I download to a new folder, quickly scan through the shots with Canon's Zoombrowser EX, delete the crappy ones and then save to the relevant folder where it's stored.

Specific questions -

1) I like Zoombrowzer, but afaik it doesn't support tagging keywords to the file (IPTC etc.). I would like to add tags during this process of deciding on the keepers and non-keepers. Atm I tag with iTag, but this introduces another step that's maybe avoidable.

(I like Zoombrowser's lay-out, photos seem sharper, it has a handy full screen preview with shooting information and the ability to split the screen to view photos next to each other.)

Any suggestion re. what program to use for this stage? Preferably something light and simple.

2) Later on I'll do some PS'ing on specific photos if I want to print/share. On the assumption that I currently only shoot Jpegs, is it worthwhile using DDP in stead of PS? I have no knowledge of DDP at all. Adjustment are usually just a bit of sharpening and brightness/contrast.


Thanks! :)
 
Whatever you get try and get an application that does facial recognition. Aperture 3 does and it is really simplifying my life.
 
Quote Originally Posted by SMARTASS :)
Free photo editing software from Google, now with name tags.




Vista and Windows 7 do in fact use metadata compatible with the latest IPTC Core spec, which is XMP-based. The problem is that Picasa still uses the old legacy IPTC-IIM spec, in place of the now-preferred IPTC Core and other IPTC standards that use an XML approach based around XMP. As it happens, Microsoft are tracking standards more closely than Google in this area, not the other way round as you seem to imply.

Picasa only recognises the “legacy” format of IPTC, usually referred to as IPTC-IIM (Information Interchange Model). Vista, Windows 7, Windows Live Photo Gallery, Adobe Bridge, Lightroom, Photo Mechanic, IDimager and many others are designed to work with this older format AND the newer format known as XMP. The IPTC organisation itself has now deprecated its old IPTC-IIM specification, and encourages professional photographers, news and stock image organisations to use the newer IPTC Core and other formats based on XMP. For those that want a better understanding of these formats see the Photometdata website (http://www.photometadata.org/META-101-metadata-types).

Ideally, Picasa should be using XMP for its metadata. Then we'd have a fighting chance of getting it to interoperate with the other software applications and operating systems mentioned above.

(this BTW relates to Picasa 3.5)

And also -
Not all programs support IPTC/XMP. Those that don't support it will often strip out this data when saving a photo that had IPTC/XMP data in it. To test, write some IPTC/XMP data into a photo using an IPTC/XMP compliant program (i.e. Breezebrowser, Irfanview, Photoshop, Photo Info) then load this photo into your graphics program of choice and save it out as a regular JPEG file (with a new filename). For instance, Google's Picasa (as of v.3) only supports the older legacy version of IPTC in JPEG files, if you edit and save a photo from Picasa some IPTC data will be lost. If the IPTC/XMP data is gone when using your photo editor, then scrap it and write the manufacturer telling them to move into the 21st century and support IPTC/XMP metadata. See "Map Your Labelling Fields" below.

;) :)

If I'm going to all the trouble of tagging photo's I'd prefer it in the standard format for maximum compatibility.
 
(this BTW relates to Picasa 3.5)

And also -


;) :)

If I'm going to all the trouble of tagging photo's I'd prefer it in the standard format for maximum compatibility.

ah, ok... so there's more to this than just tags....
 
I don't have anything against mac except that I don't have a mac.
(that and maybe cos my G73 is better :D)
 
I don't have anything against mac except that I don't have a mac.
(that and maybe cos my G73 is better :D)
Dont worry about it - if it wasn't for PC users, mac owners would only be smugly average. :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X