For really big refurbs (painting the whole building etc.) we get another company to project manage. They're typically the same company that's helped draft our 10 year maintenance plan. They source contractors, oversee the job, hold contractors accountable for work once done.Thanks for explaining @repitah.
Sorry for me but I was elected to oversee the current job of replacing several courtyard doors - and I'm female! Fortunately we have several engineers (ex trustees) as volunteers so I take one of them with me to have a quick look around. Some of the men in this complex have done their stint as trustees and have now resigned, others refuse so I was painted into a corner and had to accept the trusteeship, a position I refused for 3 years.
Smaller jobs our managing agent has a maintenance guy. Their offices are close to the building, so whenever a contractor is on site the maintenance guy is usually here at the start to ensure things are ok.
This is why I prefer doing everything through the managing agent. They're the one's who communicate to the contractor so no trustee can get their finger in the pie and ask for favours. It almost never happens that any of us ever deal directly with a contractor.What really, annoyed me though is the work was quoted, approved and scheduled to begin on Wednesday and finish on Friday/Saturday. On Friday the contractor told me the Main Man Messiah to whom you refer above (he's the financial trustee) instructed him to replace sections of the ceiling in 2 units he owns - HUH?
I realise there's managing agents who are very hands off and literally just do the finances. But it's one of those things where I'd rather pay more and get a more complete service and all communication gets channeled via them to contractors & owners. Then there's a shared paper-trail of everything and a public record of who said what & when. It also drastically diffuses any power imbalance where trustess will attempt what your guy did and get favours from the contractor or attempt to dictate a job to you.
