Article: Audi R8 crash docket 'gone'

Creag

The Boar's Rock
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
46,389
Reaction score
8,933
Location
Joburg
http://www.timeslive.co.za/thetimes/2013/01/16/audi-r8-crash-docket-gone

985499_817861.jpg

The remains of an Audi R8 on Oxford Road, Rosebank, in which a motorist and a policeman died early yesterday. The driver had raced away while the policeman was in his car searching for drugs. Lieutenant-Colonel Lungelo Dlamini said two police officers had stopped the vehicle and found a small amount of dagga inside. The second policeman gave chase in a police van when the driver sped off. The Audi driver eventually lost control and hit a tree, a wall and a lamppost. He and the policeman were declared dead at the scene Picture: JAMES OATWAY

The Independent Police Investigative Directorate says it has been unable to locate the police docket relating to the car crash that claimed the life of a policeman and a businessman during the early hours of Thursday on Oxford Road, Johannesburg .

The police insist that the docket is being handled by a specialised provincial police investigative unit and is under lock and key - but the directorate, the police watchdog, says it has been unable to locate it.

The directorate investigates high-profile crimes committed by the police, such as corruption.

Its spokesman, Moses Dlamini, said: "Up to today we have not been given the docket. We have made inquiries but have not received it. We don't know where it is."

The docket contains details of the mysterious car crash that killed Constable Goodman Lubisi and businessman Areff Haffejee. They were killed when Haffejee lost control of his Audi R8 supercar and crashed into a lamppost and a wall in Oxford Road.

At the time, police claimed that Haffejee had tried to escape officers who had found dagga in his car when they stopped him at a roadblock in Sandton, northern Johannesburg.

They allege that Haffejee, pursued by Lubisi's partner in a police van, crashed his car during a high-speed chase.

But the police's version of events has been rubbished by witnesses, police officers close to the investigation and investigative directorate detectives.

The police have failed to explain:

  • Why Lubisi did not use his service pistol to force Haffejee to stop his car;
  • Why the policemen did not call for backup;
  • Why Lubisi's colleagues at the crash scene waited nearly 10 minutes before calling for ambulances;
  • Why the police van's vehicle monitoring device shows that the vehicle was not speeding, braking hard or rapidly cornering, as it would in a high-speed chase;
  • What happened to the dagga said to have been found in Haffejee's car;
  • Why there was a delay in notifying the investigative directorate about the crash; and
  • Why the statement of witness Selaelo Mannya, who was driving alongside the police van and the Audi, had not been taken.
The police have yet to name a third policeman involved, who was travelling in the police van.

An IPID investigator said there were "major" discrepancies between the police's version of events and what other evidence suggested.

"There is no technical evidence to support the theory of a chase. If there was [a chase], why was the police van driving slowly - in some parts of the 'chase' no faster than 40km/h," the investigator said.

"If Haffejee was not trying to get away, we need to know why the policeman was in his car. We need to know why it took so long for the police to contact the IPID."

He said the investigation would look into the policemen's service records.

"So far we have not been able to question the other policemen as they are on sick leave."

Mannya said claims by the police that they were chasing Haffejee were rubbish.

"When I stopped at a traffic light both the Audi and the police stopped next to me. Why would they do this if they were chasing?"

Mannya said that though he had given the police all his contact details, he had not been asked to provide a statement.

"What I saw happening was highly suspicious . those policemen were not chasing that car . they were not in a hurry to phone for help."

Police spokesman Brigadier Neville Malila said the docket was not lost.

"It is with the provincial investigative unit, which is tasked to investigate high-profile crimes," he said.

"They are investigating this incident because one of our own died and because of the allegations."
 
CONSPIRACY!!

Actually, wouldn't put it past them to blatantly lie about this to the public.
 
I'm sure the R8 also had satellite tracking? Maybe that could also fill in a few blanks.
 
CONSPIRACY!!

Actually, wouldn't put it past them to blatantly lie about this to the public.

As they usually do when their actions are questioned.
They have probably been very very busy editing the docket and looking for ways to somehow justify excluding evidence and witness statements.

Once done, the docket will suddenly come to light.

I also remember some great fanfare in announcing that lost dockets were a thing of the past, as they were captured electronically.
However, with the hard copy out the way, it would be pretty easy to amend the electronic copy to be more "sympathetic" to their cause.
 
The police have failed to explain:

  • (1)Why Lubisi did not use his service pistol to force Haffejee to stop his car;
  • (2) Why the policemen did not call for backup;
  • (3)Why Lubisi's colleagues at the crash scene waited nearly 10 minutes before calling for ambulances;
  • (4)Why the police van's vehicle monitoring device shows that the vehicle was not speeding, braking hard or rapidly cornering, as it would in a high-speed chase;
  • (5)What happened to the dagga said to have been found in Haffejee's car;
  • (6)Why there was a delay in notifying the investigative directorate about the crash; and
  • (7)Why the statement of witness Selaelo Mannya, who was driving alongside the police van and the Audi, had not been taken.

possible SAPS responses .....

(1) he doesn't know how to shoot. we didn't train him before. :p
(2) they don't know how to use radio / phone. we didn't train them before. ;)
(3) told you they didn't be trained to use the radio, my god, are you listening? :wtf:
(4) that must be a third force ... We don't know what that is, but we will investigate. :D
(5) he "took" it. er.... he used it just before the accident. (0.0002 ms before the crash) :rolleyes:
(6) We don't have your number, we didn't know each other until you phoned me. :o
(7) bloody agent, he may be the third force behind. :mad:

clear? :D
 
How on earth would the newspaper know that the police van's vehicle monitoring device shows that the vehicle was not speeding, braking hard or rapidly cornering, as it would in a high-speed chase????
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X