Article: Zuma reshuffles his cabinet

It seems they might be serious about this performance monitoring business after all. 17 Months was long enough to give people a chance, IMO...
 
sox63 said:
It seems they might be serious about this performance monitoring business after all. 17 Months was long enough to give people a chance, IMO...
Click to expand...
Well how do you explain Blade staying on. Gigaba minister of Public Enterprises?! Hogan was obviously too tough on incompetence and nepotism - Gama should now get his Transet CEO'ship because the racist BMF is in league with the ANCYL (excuse the pun). Him & Fikile were appointed to appease the YL & ensure Zuma gets another term. And the allegedly corrupt Sicelo stays on?
 
R13... said:
Well how do you explain Blade staying on. Gigaba minister of Public Enterprises?! Hogan was obviously too tough on incompetence and nepotism - Gama should now get his Transet CEO'ship because the racist BMF is in league with the ANCYL (excuse the pun). Him & Fikile were appointed to appease the YL & ensure Zuma gets another term. And the allegedly corrupt Sicelo stays on?
Click to expand...

Did I say any of the appointments were good or bad? I was just commenting on the reshuffle under the guise of what they had promised to do. Which was to remove those they thought were not delivering...
 
sox63 said:
Did I say any of the appointments were good or bad? I was just commenting on the reshuffle under the guise of what they had promised to do. Which was to remove those they thought were not delivering...
Click to expand...
The reshuffle was ostensibly in the name of improved service delivery. But anyone can see Zuma needed to appease the political fall out, Nyanda will probably continue to receive government work, the minister of women was easy to get of rid of with no political fall out. Zuma and the ANC have realised that having Hogan in a ministry is a bit like appointing Ramphele to cabinet (too independent for their liking). In the ANC tough decisions are only made after the potential political fall out is assessed, serviced delivery impact is tertiary (always)!
 
R13... said:
The reshuffle was ostensibly in the name of improved service delivery. But anyone can see Zuma needed to appease the political fall out, Nyanda will probably continue to receive government work, the minister of women was easy to get of rid of with no political fall out. Zuma and the ANC have realised that having Hogan in a ministry is a bit like appointing Ramphele to cabinet (too independent for their liking). In the ANC tough decisions are only made after the potential political fall out is assessed, serviced delivery impact is tertiary (always)!
Click to expand...

Is that to imply that she did a good job and was unfairly removed?
 
R13... said:
This reshuffle won't affect that election... it is 2012 Zuma is looking to.
Click to expand...

You misunderstand.

The reshuffle is to keep votes in the election, because "we replaced some ministers because we care for the needs of the poor so much".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X