F
Fudzy
Guest
My guess is that wizard meant to use can't instead of can.
The point being that windows only mounts FAT and NTFS drives. And ext3 with the use of 3rd party software. Therefore to make the comparison, windows would actually have to mount other filetypes which are not MS based. So just like Windows mounts FAT/NTFS drives automatically, so too does Linux mount its related drives automatically.
In fact if you take the time to learn about the install process, you can even have Linux mount all partitions (including NTFS) automatically. But you have to be willing to learn and do the research. You are used to your Windows ways. We get it. However Linux is not Windows. You have to do things the Linux way. I have been using linux 95% of the time at home for the last 5 years. When a friend asks me to troubleshoot their Windows issues, I often have the same thought – damn Windows makes it difficult to fix things. The point being that if you continue to think of your Windows way of doing things when in Linux, your frustrations will continue to grow.
Yeah, what can I say, I've been using Windows for almost 20 years now so I'm pretty entrenched in the way I expect things to work, which they do, without any obscure terminal commands and text file editing. I have enjoyed dabbling with linux but I don't see it serving any more purpose than a IT hobby, I think if I were to really get into it I'd try dive into it more seriously with a distribution that doesn't give you a candy-coated gui that in essence, tries to be Windows.
Each to their own I guess, thanks for convincing me to kill my Ubuntu partition.