South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
My question is simple: Vodacom KNOWS that there are fraudulent WASPs, so why is it not simply applying a double opt-in by SMS to new WASPs? Any new service which can be loaded by a WASP to a Vodacom subscriber's account for daily billing without user confirmation makes one question why Vodacom would rather risk irate customers rather than just making life harder for legitimate WASPs.
So we live in a world where Vodacom will probably give you double opt-in on email newsletters, but let a third-party bill your account with no independent confirmation from you?All about the $$$ for Vodacum.
You spelled Vodacrap wrong...My question is simple: Vodacom KNOWS that there are fraudulent WASPs, so why is it not simply applying a double opt-in by SMS to new WASPs? Any new service which can be loaded by a WASP to a Vodacom subscriber's account for daily billing without user confirmation makes one question why Vodacom would rather risk irate customers rather than just making life harder for legitimate WASPs.
So we live in a world where Vodacom will probably give you double opt-in on email newsletters, but let a third-party bill your account with no independent confirmation from you?
I don't know if big corporates like Vodacom are really evil anymore. In my experience things like this are just old-fashioned incompetence. The developers adding the WASP billing hook weren't tasked with creating a double opt-in, and nobody at Customer Care (who receives all the complaints) has managed to convince anybody in Finance to spend money to close this loophole. Maybe in another two decades.You're a bit late to the show... Any corporate that can make extra money from you with minimal risk will do so.
Yup that is correct. The development teams think their shift does not stink and ignore support requests. This happens all over.I don't know if big corporates like Vodacom are really evil anymore. In my experience things like this are just old-fashioned incompetence. The developers adding the WASP billing hook weren't tasked with creating a double opt-in, and nobody at Customer Care (who receives all the complaints) has managed to convince anybody in Finance to spend money to close this loophole. Maybe in another two decades.
Spelled VodaconYou spelled Vodacrap wrong...
Same shiFt different spellingSpelled Vodacon
That's the thing. I don't even know how I'm meant to access this chat I was subscribed to, which should bother Vodacom slightly.Is the chat at least as fun as promised?
So we live in a world where Vodacom will probably give you double opt-in on email newsletters, but let a third-party bill your account with no independent confirmation from you?
I think that would be dangerous to do, because that wouldn't prevent me from being subscribed fraudulently ... it would just mean that I don't receive the notifications when I am subscribed fraudulently.^^ Maybe also block 0820097640 on your phone in case the 'unsubscribed' sms doesn't stop other WASPS using the same number. Tellows reports it under ' harassment / spam / cost traps' from Mobsto, Powerplay, Fun Chat, among others.
more details:
Cost trap 0820097640 - 24 Ratings
Phone number 0820097640 from Vodacom tagged as Cost trap 15 times: Welcome! You have successfully subscribe... 4928 searches on tellows, the online anti-spam communitywww.tellows.co.za
Because they are a bunch of greedy criminals.My question is simple: Vodacom KNOWS that there are fraudulent WASPs, so why is it not simply applying a double opt-in by SMS to new WASPs? Any new service which can be loaded by a WASP to a Vodacom subscriber's account for daily billing without user confirmation makes one question why Vodacom would rather risk irate customers rather than just making life harder for legitimate WASPs.
When did South Africans become so hate-filled? Sanral is "scum", ANC are "corrupt wankers", Vodacom are "greedy criminals". Over-exaggerate much? Vodacom has thousands of employees nationally ... for them all to be "greedy criminals", they've got one hell of a targeted recruitment programme starting at the jails.Because they are a bunch of greedy criminals.
Mainly because they stole several thousand rand from me through fraudulent WASP and content subscriptions....When did South Africans become so hate-filled? Sanral is "scum", ANC are "corrupt wankers", Vodacom are "greedy criminals". Over-exaggerate much? Vodacom has thousands of employees nationally ... for them all to be "greedy criminals", they've got one hell of a targeted recruitment programme starting at the jails.
Bro, bring the hate down a couple clicks to a medium simmer, ok? We're not going to understand why bad things happen if we're looking at it like an angry bull charging after the latest red rag.
Yeah man, sounds like you have a right to be angry, but I don't think that right extends to dehumanizing every single Vodacom employee under the label of "greedy criminals". I've had a couple good Vodacom-related experiences, and when I've raised a billing issue with them recently they resolved it swiftly (honouring a data discount a sales rep offered me).Mainly because they stole several thousand rand from me through fraudulent WASP and content subscriptions....
I stand by my comments.
Will send you the account statements if you want to see for yourself.
I have friends who work for Vodacom, they know what happened and are just as angry. I do not consider them to be part of the criminal organisation. So when I refer to them as criminals I am obviously referring to the people who are actually responsible for this.Yeah man, sounds like you have a right to be angry, but I don't think that right extends to dehumanizing every single Vodacom employee under the label of "greedy criminals". I've had a couple good Vodacom-related experiences, and when I've raised a billing issue with them recently they resolved it swiftly (honouring a data discount a sales rep offered me).
However, for you to share your WASP experience is definitely on-topic. How did you lose "several thousand rand", and when did you first realise this?
Because, with a line or two of code they could block every single WASP and make opt-out the default. They could also implement a stricter method of opting in. But they won't because they make Billions off it every year.Vodacom are "greedy criminals". Over-exaggerate much?