Boverty - bovine effect on poverty. Fascinating

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
Reaction score
27
Location
Slaapstad
Very interesting 2 part series on the impacts of cattle on humans and the environment.

From Part 1:

Boverty is the human impact of too many bovines overwhelming the local biosphere’s ability to feed them … the bovines are usually cattle and more than a few African countries have precisely this problem. Their livestock is a millstone around their necks and helping to keep them poor. Well-meaning aid organisations often contribute to the problem.

The ecosystem impacts of cattle spread far and wide but it may not be the owners of the animals who suffer the impacts. Indeed, the animals can buffer their owners against the worst impacts of boverty. This is analogous to the way that drivers of large SUVs do well in collisions with smaller vehicles. The entire community suffers from the presence of the vehicles, but the owners may be the least affected.

But these conclusions are just the end point of a longish discussion. We need to start at the beginning. But before we get to the beginning, here is a MODIS satellite firemap of the planet during the last days of December 2009. The sub-Saharan cattle countries are ablaze.

This post surveys the impacts of livestock, firstly at a very general level on the biosphere due to its domination of global biomass consumption, proceeding through the cattle-specific annual planetary conflagrations as people ignite the world’s grasslands to prevent reforestation. Lastly, we look at more intimate and sometimes more indirect bovine impacts, like the accelerated degradation of arable soil, the tens or hundreds of thousands of children killed by cooking with dung, and the global increase in respiratory and heart disease from ozone increases caused by rising methane levels.

Cattle are a major causal component in all these problems. The planet’s 1.4 billion cattle have a liveweight biomass exceeding that of humans and dominate many of our adverse impacts on planetary eco-systems.

Source
 
Last edited:
From Part 2:

Western aid organisations, particularly those run by BBQ obsessed Australians, seem dominated by people haven’t woken up to the simple fact that the foods they grew up on when the planet had half its present population haven’t been sustainable globally for a very long time. Even in Australia, with its vast landmass and small human population, the production of these foods has driven and continues to drive water shortages, environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Advocacy of such foods in Africa will benefit few and damage prospects of long term food security.

Source
 
Last edited:
I'm not very smart, and don't understand the article. It seems interesting though, can someone cleverer than me please explain the points he is making?
Or is it the usual too much cattle is problem in many different areas, which we have known for a long time and is nothing new.
All meat eating countries have large amounts of cattle, so what exactly is the connection between owning cattle and poverty in Africa?
 
The gist of the article is that the farming of grazing animals, especially cows, causes far more devasting long term environmental destruction while providing FAR LESS food per unit of a given resources (land, water etc) than plant crops. So a push for more livestock farming in Africa is not a solution to its food problems, and NGOs and other organisations that are promoting livestock agriculture are doing much more harm than good.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X