Burned vs Burnt

Polymathic

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
33,670
Reaction score
14,746
I was watching a YouTube video this morning and somebody in the video made reference to a passage in a book which used both the terms of burned and burnt and he was confused why the author used different spelling because according to him it's the exact same thing.

Personally I used both terms and I distinguish between to the 2 as.

Burned: past tense of the verb "burn"
"The fire burned the wood"

Burnt: adjective to describe something that has been burned.
"The wood is burnt"

Does anybody else make the distinction, because according to Google they are both the exact same thing?
 
Last edited:
This is another one of those American English things, only done in America English:

Burned is past tense of burn
Burnt is an adjective

In all other non-american English, it's used interchangeably and is acceptable..

Therefore, please feel free to use them interchangeably on this forum and in all other countries where they speak English, accept that special snowflake, the US of A...
 
He burned his bridges .is not quite the same as..
he burnt his bridges .
the world of idioms reign supreme .
 
  • Like
Reactions: rh1
Okay, so I'm not only person that makes the distinction.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X