I think the problem is that you declared that the property will be for rental purposes on your application form.
Have not applied. Just doing my homework before I sign an OTP.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I think the problem is that you declared that the property will be for rental purposes on your application form.
Do whatever will get you the loan in a manner you can afford.a) higher deposit required
b) they take a % of the value of the property towards the affordability calculation
I could easily qualify to buy the new property using the above scheme. The only problem is that I would rather rent out my old (and more expensive) property.
Good trick.Do you have an SO in the house? Do the two of you have separate bank accounts? You could "Lease" the house to her/him? They transfer to your account, you take over some of the financial brunt that they are carrying? Not exactly ethical, but it is not like the banks are being ethical.
You may get a totally different story from an actual application.Have not applied. Just doing my homework before I sign an OTP.
Dont disclose that you will be renting out the new place you are buying.
So did OP eventually manage to get the second house?
Sold it. I'm now renting...don't feel like property ownership in SA fits in with my long term plans.
I see...it seems as though banks make it difficult for current home owners to buy a second place with the aim of renting out the original one. I'm trying to purchase another place to rent out my existing one to family, but it doesn't look too optimistic.
Why thou? Why are banks against this? I am also in the process of buying additional apartments to rent out.I see...it seems as though banks make it difficult for current home owners to buy a second place with the aim of renting out the original one. I'm trying to purchase another place to rent out my existing one to family, but it doesn't look too optimistic.
They look at total exposure. Wanted to do this in 2003 with a third property and they insisted I had to sell one.Why thou? Why are banks against this? I am also in the process of buying additional apartments to rent out.
That's so silly, I would have thought the more property you have the better as it's all assets that the bank could take of you fail to pay.They look at total exposure. Wanted to do this in 2003 with a third property and they insisted I had to sell one.
Correct. Total exposure too much. Rental income not factored in.That's so silly, I would have thought the more property you have the better as it's all assets that the bank could take of you fail to pay.
Or did you already have like 2 loans and where looking for a third?
Actually now that I think about it I had two flats and two houses so can't really blame them for wanting to offload some.Aha okey that makes sense.
I wanted to build a second place on a plot I own and the bank told me rental income on an existing property doesn't count at all. Seems banks do their own thing. Unless that's for a building loan.
Why thou? Why are banks against this? I am also in the process of buying additional apartments to rent out.
Yes. It's a long term project. This year I will buy a place that I live in so will be paying the bond instead of the rent and then will also buy another place that will be rented out. That is this year, then next year I have a commercial property that I want to buy and I have heard through the grapevine the owner is having financial difficulties so I'm keeping my eye on it to swoop.What? You were just posting elsewhere that you renting so that you can save up to buy?