Sign up with Google![[)roi(]](/forum/data/avatars/m/8/8711.jpg?1563828683){kind=avatar}
[)roi(]
Executive Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Messages
- 6,282
In 2012 Doug Gregor (Apple) did a presentation focusing on Modules; or more specifically on the "On the Fundamental Brokenness of Headers", and how implementing support for modules in LLVM and Clang would overcome a lot of those issues: "Writing a Module Futuristic Version"; major stumbling points were seen as:
Benefits of moving to modules were reasoned to be:
Here's the slides and video from that talk: https://isocpp.org/blog/2012/11/modules-update-on-work-in-progress-doug-gregor
Many had thought this would't be possible; so was surprised to see the following tweets between the compiler teams at:
... from talks at CppCon:
In short; it's not only working, but Google has enabled in ~10% of its current codebase. So great news -- FYI I'll put up any videos links and slides when they become available.
Here's a related twitter poll on whether macros should be supported for modules, naturally the answer is yes; or as someone put it: "if you argue, you loose". https://twitter.com/meetingcpp/status/779359906667171840
Here's a link to the CppCon's site: http://cppcon.org
Next pie in the sky:
- Transitioning existing header-based libraries
- Interoperability with compilers that don’t implement modules
- Requires tools that understand modules
Benefits of moving to modules were reasoned to be:
- Compile/build time improvements
- Modules are a huge potential win for C(++)
- Fix various preprocessor problems
- Far better tool experience
- Design enables smooth transition path
Here's the slides and video from that talk: https://isocpp.org/blog/2012/11/modules-update-on-work-in-progress-doug-gregor
Many had thought this would't be possible; so was surprised to see the following tweets between the compiler teams at:
- Apple: https://twitter.com/dgregor79/status/779160218190000128,
- Google: https://twitter.com/echristo/status/779087377331552256,
- LLVM: https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/779086896798371840
... from talks at CppCon:
In short; it's not only working, but Google has enabled in ~10% of its current codebase. So great news -- FYI I'll put up any videos links and slides when they become available.
Here's a related twitter poll on whether macros should be supported for modules, naturally the answer is yes; or as someone put it: "if you argue, you loose". https://twitter.com/meetingcpp/status/779359906667171840
Here's a link to the CppCon's site: http://cppcon.org
Next pie in the sky:
Last edited: