ldmelsa
Executive Member
it shoots very well LOL
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
As nice as the limited edition cammo model?Nice machine gun you have there![]()
Maybe just a little bit . . .Lol did you Photoshop that?
I haven't used it, but I know quite a few folks on ODP were not too impressed with it. You may also want to look at a Tamron 17-50 f2.8. It doesn't have IS, but folks who use it rate it very highly.What do you guys think about the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM ? Looks good but for the price I can actually get the 70-300 f4-5.6 IS USM.
I haven't used it, but I know quite a few folks on ODP were not too impressed with it. You may also want to look at a Tamron 17-50 f2.8. It doesn't have IS, but folks who use it rate it very highly.
but how do they expect people to take photos without IS?I haven't used it, but I know quite a few folks on ODP were not too impressed with it. You may also want to look at a Tamron 17-50 f2.8. It doesn't have IS, but folks who use it rate it very highly.
but how do they expect people to take photos without IS?
![]()
ROTFL (wish they add a smiley for that one!)
but how do they expect people to take photos without IS?
![]()
So do I.Very very difficult, I have a 300 mil lens without IS so I know.![]()
Taken with the 17-85mm IS![]()
Very very difficult, I have a 300 mil lens without IS so I know.![]()
So do I.![]()
Taken with the 17-85mm IS![]()
What do you guys think of the Canon EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM ?


I never understand how you can say any lens is pointless just because its a crop camera.very useful lens
I've got one.
28mm
[The Internet says this lens suffers from distortion. - I'll let you be the judge.]
But it's for 35mm. I hear it's not designed for sensors.
Besides, why would you want that range for a crop factor camera?
If you have a crop factor cam, this lens is pretty pointless IMO.
You will already have 18-55 with your kit lens.
Then, if you want a tele, there is the 55-250 IS.