pete
Expert Member
I am looking the technical reason why one cannot run Cat5 solid more than 100m, and flex more than 30m. My google skills are failing me. Please help.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Signal degradation being the result of resistance, not so?
Total distance between an Ethernet Transmitter and Receiver at the absolute end points of the network (maximum diameter from origin to final destination, if the wires were stretched out to form a straight line): 100 Meters (328 ft., 109 yds., or about the length of a football field). This limitation results from the timing of the Ethernet signals on the cable and not necessarily the cable characteristics, and is, therefore, a "hard" number.
Signal degradation being the result of resistance, not so?
I ran a 100m flex cable from the pc to the point for two hours yesterday without a single error.
And today I'm going to try a 150m, and then a 200m.
Will post results here.
its called attenuation. It is the degradation of electrical signals due to the physical characteristics of the electrical signals and the hardware used.
basically the 100m is the reliable distance that cat5 can cover where the signals would be received correctly.
so basically if the signals are sent as normal TTL (ie 2.2V - 5V = '1' and 0v - 0.4v = '0') this voltage would degrade over the 100m to say 2.6v high or due to interferrance the low could be recieved as a 0.3v and at this point the signal would still be readable even though it has been altered somewhat.
the length of the link would also be dependant on interferrance, cable quality and the quality of the signal being output. So for instance a laptop might put out 4.5v whereas a desktop might put out a little more than 5v.
....this is my understanding of the limitations....use it dont use it![]()