Has anybody else noticed that CellC is by no means subsidising the cost of cellphones but in fact ripping you a little off on their contracts. Currently, I see no benefit in going for one of their fixed term contracts (6, 12 , 18 or 24 months) as the price you pay for the phone is almost always more than the prepaid cost for the phone. Would rather go for prepaid or month to month contract (on CellC) and pay for the phone up front, that way you have full flexibility.
For example, the HTC One X is going for around R7k prepaid and on CellC for any contract, between R30/m and R800/m you pay a R370/m subsidy (R8880 over 24 months) for the handset, no discount at all for high end users.
Then even stranger is the Samsung Galaxy S2, on straight up 50, you pay R249/m, but if you want the straight up 100 (extra R50/m on prepaid) you have to fork out R370/m, not R299 as you would expect.
For example, the HTC One X is going for around R7k prepaid and on CellC for any contract, between R30/m and R800/m you pay a R370/m subsidy (R8880 over 24 months) for the handset, no discount at all for high end users.
Then even stranger is the Samsung Galaxy S2, on straight up 50, you pay R249/m, but if you want the straight up 100 (extra R50/m on prepaid) you have to fork out R370/m, not R299 as you would expect.