CERN is the CIA

Peon

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
3,666
You got to understand some people are mentally ill. I suffer from mental illness and can see where this guy went wrong. Proper medication and help does work. Hopefully this guy will get the same.
 

ToxicBunny

Oi! Leave me out of this...
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
113,505
No Arthur..

There is no need to be kind and gentle with this soul...

You can't even describe him as mentally retarded because that would be an insult to those who genuinely are. He does need a running kick fsck slap for being a dingleberry though.
 

Arthur

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2003
Messages
26,879
Hehe. Not every wrong view is caused by a disease. Many people with intact mental apparatus are sincerely socialists, or materialists/atheists, or buy into loopy notions like anthropogenic global warming. They're not insane, just wrong. Bad parenting probably played some part. :p
 

OMB

Mountain Man
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
39,590
Hehe. Not every wrong view is caused by a disease. Many people with intact mental apparatus are sincerely socialists, or materialists/atheists, or buy into loopy notions like anthropogenic global warming. They're not insane, just wrong. Bad parenting probably played some part.
This is probably one of the dumbest posts I've ever seen from you
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
78,906
Hehe. Not every wrong view is caused by a disease. Many people with intact mental apparatus are sincerely socialists, or materialists/atheists, or buy into loopy notions like anthropogenic global warming. They're not insane, just wrong. Bad parenting probably played some part. :p

You forgot christians
 

Jings

Treasure Maker
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
39,683
This guy is not mentally ill. He's got a "donate" button. Back in the old days they were called court jesters.
 

Jings

Treasure Maker
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
39,683
Why don't you go and look, Forbes doesn't

I did look some years back when reading up on Illuminati conspiracy and the Rothschilds and Rockerfellas non appearance on the Forbes list. However, Forbes methodology is logical. Hasn't changed since I last checked.

We have not included fortunes dispersed across large families (as in those of the Du Ponts) when individual net worths are below our minimum of $1 billion per name. But we do include wealth belonging to a member’s immediate relatives if the wealth can ultimately be traced to one living individual; in that case “& family” indicates that the number shown includes money belonging to more than one person.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2012/03/07/methodology-how-we-crunch-the-numbers/#693c758e1511
 
Last edited:
Top