South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Probably professional indemnity and fidelity insurance. Maybe they're expecting a lot of lawsuits?Gru said:Insured for 172.6m with assets od only 15,1m? How did they do that? If it was me i'd be looking for petrol and matches round about now so i could start collecting that insurance money![]()
Rkootknir said:And cheques instead of checks? Really? (Imagine extremely sarcastic tone)![]()
A service company's amount of insurance will have very little (or no) relation to its assets. Most of it will be used to cover against errors made by employees (professional indemnity) or dishonesty of employees (fidelity cover).EdRobinson said:Icasa also appears to be substantially overinsured. It has fixed assets of R15,1m but is insured for R172,6m.
Strange... maybe they are a major shareholder in Telkom but haven't declared it. lol.
R172.6 m... hmm that's a little more than 1000 percent over insured. Gosh.. how did that happen :-D
Who knows.. maybe ICASA = TELKOM... would make sense...
Billy said:Assets are depreciated annually usually over between 2 and 7 years.
Insurance is at replacement value.
I have a watch which cost R100 and is now insured for R6500.
pimal3 said:Lose your watch and claim for R6500. You will be lucky to get R100 back less depreciation.
If someone were to substantiate what insurance policies these were, we could ascertain as to whether they are over-insured. If the policy is for assets only, then without a doubt, they are over-insured, but if it includes cover for professional indemnity and fidelity insurance (as already stated by two forum members already) then it is pretty much justified.EdRobinson said:None of the above replies regarding insurance offer any logical explanation about how they can end up being over insured to the tune of 1000%... any takers? Or do you agree that it's a little strange. (Surely!?)