China - Taiwan Developments

The national post is a conservative canadian newspaper. Similar to the Wallstreet Journal.

And no there is still no evidence today. Obama didn't drop it, because the whole US establishment was sold on the story.

The USs goal in Afghanistan was regime change. That became clear as soon as they got a foothold. Benladen was the convenient excuse to go in.

Even during the course of the war there was an opportunity to get him in Torra Bora, the establishment wasn't interested.

Evidence for this wall of shid Nico You and the conspiracy theorists are the only ones that believe it with no evidence at all.
 
Evidence for this wall of shid Nico You and the conspiracy theorists are the only ones that believe it with no evidence at all.

I showed you above.

As for civilians, about 46k died in Afganistan.
 

So only the US is to blame for the Kurds? No blame for the Turks, Iraqi and Syrians then? Your absolute anti USA stance is showing. Only the US to blame for the problems of the entire world.
 
And yet the Bush and Obama administrations went to extensive lengths in pushing the ridiculous safe haven myth. They argued essentially that America could never leave Afghanistan because then the Afghan state would fail, the Taliban would regain power, and al Qaeda would be invited back into the country. Indeed, in the early years of the war it was common to hear the terms “al Qaeda” and “Taliban” used interchangeably as the government worked hard to conflate Osama bin Laden’s group with Mullah Omar’s government. But as Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn demonstrate in their book, An Enemy We Created: The Myth of the Taliban-Al Qaeda Merger in Afghanistan, the former Taliban leader couldn’t stand bin Laden and resented the radical terrorist’s threat to his fledgling regime, putting it in the crosshairs of the American superpower.

When the Washington Times’s Arnaud de Borchgrave interviewed Omar in summer 2001 he complained that bin Laden was like a “chicken bone stuck in his throat, that he can’t swallow or spit out.” An Army War College study said that bin Laden had refused to swear loyalty to Omar other than through a deniable proxy.

When the war came, the Taliban progressively loosened its conditions for extradition. First, it offered to surrender bin Laden and his men to an impartial Muslim state upon receiving evidence of bin Laden’s role in the attacks; next, it offered to turn bin Laden over to Pakistan upon being presented with evidence; and finally, once U.S. bombs started falling, the Taliban agreed to hand bin Laden over to any third country, even without evidence of his guilt. By then it was too late for the Taliban—but not for the lesson of the differences in the motives of these groups and the nature of their formerly uncomfortable, now non-existent alliance.

It bears repeating that fewer than 200 al Qaeda members escaped to Pakistan at the start of the war and thus could return to Afghanistan. Many of those have been arrested by police and spies, gone back home to pick up the revolution there, or were killed in the CIA’s Obama-era Pakistan drone war. Iran also apprehended a significant number of Arabs who had crossed their border during the initial invasion; most of those eventually were deported back to their home countries.
 

First offer: provide evidence
Second offer: we will hand him over to a neutral country.
US response: keep bombing and killing innocent civilians.

As for the ICC ever punishing those for the warcrimes that the US commited.

Afghan lives obviously matter less than the lives of those who killed them.

Rubbish Nico. The US is not under the jurisdiction of the ICC...

You didn't know that, did you?

But I am finished with Afghanistan here. This is way off topic. open your own Afghanistan thread to ply your conspiracy theories.

Notice your hero Alex Jones has been sued successfully for $4M for lying like you do?
 
Rubbish Nico. The US is not under the jurisdiction of the ICC...

You didn't know that, did you?

But I am finished with Afghanistan here. This is way off topic. open your own Afghanistan thread to ply your conspiracy theories.

Notice your hero Alex Jones has been sued successfully for $4M for lying like you do?

The ICC is used as a political tool, the strong is exempt.

I know that it's difficult to accept that you gave support for an unjust war. But it was a major crime that disrupted the lives of millions. And there still is no credible evidence that OBL was responsible for 9/11.

Alex Jones was sued for lying about Sandyhook, not for questioning when the US and UK government participates in an unjust war.
 
Alex Jones was sued for lying about Sandyhook, not for questioning when the US and UK government participates in an unjust war.

If he lied about one incident, he can never be trusted again on any other subject. Just like you.

Now back to the topic. Which is China, not Afghanistan.
 
Well, they want to run the world, but cannot control one aged, demented individual.

But behind the scenes, officials in President Joe Biden’s administration were fuming at her insistence on using the trip as a capstone for her career at a moment of highly delicate relations with Beijing.

In an effort to quietly persuade Pelosi to delay the visit, the White House dispatched senior members of the National Security Council, as well as State Department officials, to brief the speaker and her team on the geopolitical risks, people familiar with the conversations said.
 
As opposed to China which would kidnap and jail her in a secret prison for a few years if they were in the same situation.
Oh, so the WH and their National Security Adviser don't know what they are doing.I'm glad you do.
 
Last edited:
If he lied about one incident, he can never be trusted again on any other subject. Just like you.

Now back to the topic. Which is China, not Afghanistan.

I have never watched or plan to watch a single show of Alex Jones.
 
In 2015, Robert Parry, the late investigative journalist and founder of Consortium News, wrote an article titled "The Mess that Nuland Made." It summarized the aftermath of the 2014 coup in Ukraine that was engineered by Victoria Nuland, who served in Obama’s State Department and is back working for the Biden administration.

Nuland’s coup sparked widespread unrest in Ukraine, Russia taking Crimea, and the war in the eastern Donbas region. The day that Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine, the title of Parry’s salient article wouldn’t get out of my head. Nuland’s meddling in Ukraine reflected an overarching neocon, deep state agenda, but the chaos that has ensued since will always be her legacy, and her mess.

Now, as China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is lobbing missiles toward Taiwan and holding its largest-ever drills around the island, another woman that is a fixture of the establishment in Washington is to blame: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan was nothing other than a purposeful provocation that was intended to evoke the response that the PLA has given to justify more US military expansion in the region. Her trip didn’t benefit Taiwan, and it certainly didn’t defend democracy as she claimed it would.

Just as the US backing the removal of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych was a pivotal moment, so too is Pelosi’s provocation. Beijing has warned over and over again that Taiwan is a "red line" and that US support for the island’s "independence forces" will lead to war. But Pelosi, and the rest of the blob, didn’t listen, just as they didn’t listen to Russia’s warnings over Ukraine, and now Ukrainians are dying by the thousands.

We may still be a long way away from a hot war, but China will not back down, and there’s no sign the US is going to change course. Ultra-hawks in Congress are cranking out legislation to fundamentally change US policy toward Taiwan by sending them billions in military aid and requiring sanctions on China in response to a Chinese attack on the island, which would change the decades-old policy of "strategic ambiguity."

Where’s the opposition to all this madness? There is none, at least in Washington. Ro Khanna, the progressive House Democrat from California, who is so good on the wars in the Middle East, morphed into a neocon before our eyes when asked if he thinks Pelosi should go to Taiwan.

"We’re not going to let the Chinese Communist Party dictate where the Speaker of the House should go," Khanna puffed to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. "We shouldn’t allow them to bluff and dictate to America, the greatest nation in the world, where our Speaker of the House should travel."

Pelosi’s provocation also gained backing from her Republican colleagues as escalating tensions with Beijing has strong bipartisan support.

Like Nuland’s role in the Ukraine coup, Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan reflects an overall agenda in Washington, a "pivot" to the Asia Pacific that started under Obama, was ramped up by Trump, and accelerated even more under Biden. But now, as analysts are predicting that these massive PLA drills will become routine, this is the legacy the 82-year-old Pelosi will leave behind, and what lies ahead will be her mess.

 
Well, they want to run the world, but cannot control one aged, demented individual.

Really?



 
Really?




The USD is still the main global reserve (as well as international settlement) currency; and I believe also the Swift exchange currency. The US prescribes that if any financial transaction anywhere in the world takes place in, or involves the USD, it falls under US jurisdiction. And the US is trying damn hard to keep it that way.

Even though it is a Ponzi currency, it is still mightier than the US weaponry.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X