China - Taiwan Developments

I agree that Wikipedia is often right, but I also put it to you that the narrative is often wrong.

So, when the facts are right but don't suit your narrative, the facts don't count?
 
In my pursuit for true objectivity and understanding, I needed to talk less and listen more. And especially stop ‘proving’ others wrong which is terribly ‘easy’ to do on the internet, particularly when one’s opinion is that of groupthink of the narrative, which is often wrong.

Oh, your claims of enlightenment and knowing more than anyone else come to the fore again despite:

I do give you a 9/10 for relaying here what you ‘research’ on the internet!

You saying that his research is accurate...
 
well what do you call it when someone makes a claim (e.g. not being inconsistent) based on an objectively and obviously false statement (Taiwan <> Donbass)?

You yourself are inconsistent. You support the self proclaimed independence of Donbas and Luhansk yet oppose the self proclaimed independence of Taiwan. The only consistency you display is opposition to the USA.

if you tell a traffic cop that recorded you speeding that you didn't speed are you not a liar?

Wrong assumption. Courts decide your guilt, not the traffic cop.
 
You yourself are inconsistent. You support the self proclaimed independence of Donbas and Luhansk yet oppose the self proclaimed independence of Taiwan. The only consistency you display is opposition to the USA.
More and more, am thinking this is the key to understanding his positions.
 
Oh, your claims of enlightenment and knowing more than anyone else come to the fore again despite:



You saying that his research is accurate...
So you don't know what "relay" means. Then remove relay and insert parrot. And by parrot I mean the verb and not the bird.

You both parrot really well!

P.S. 0/3.
 
So you don't know what "relay" means. Then remove relay and insert parrot. And by parrot I mean the verb and not the bird.

You both parrot really well!

P.S. 0/3.
Still waiting for you to actually comment on the topic of the thread.
 
Answer me this. If Taiwan has the right to self determination (and I think they should be able to by the way), why not Crimea or the Basque region in Northern Spain?
Taiwan did not fight their way out of China. I believe you know the history and circumstances.
 
courts are merely arbiters of evidence

objective fact determines the truth, you can be a criminal without ever going to court, the act of committing a crime makes you a criminal

Prosecutors need to prove the facts presented. The judge will decide if they are plausible. The traffic cop saying you were speeding needs to prove you were. You need to defend the allegations. Neither are liars. . You cannot be a criminal without being convicted of a crime.
 
Still waiting for you to actually comment on the topic of the thread.

He never does. He makes every thread about himself and his enlightenment which proves everyone else wrong because they don't know what he knows and he was once unenlightened like you are...
 
Prosecutors need to prove the facts presented. The judge will decide if they are plausible. The traffic cop saying you were speeding needs to prove you were. You need to defend the allegations. Neither are liars. . You cannot be a criminal without being convicted of a crime.
the accused is a liar if they know the objective truth is the opposite of what they are claiming
they're liar with or without any court, prosecutor, judge involved at all

do you need a court and a judge to tell you when the sky is blue, or can you check for yourself?
if the sky is blue and you say it is not, do you need a court to call you a liar?

no, obviously, your own actions make you a liar

you're conflating the justice system with objective fact, either purposely so or through ineptitude, doesn't matter actually as you are still wrong

... but just to help you process that statement: Judge Narrowbandftw has ruled and found you wrong

happy? :cool:
 
He never does. He makes every thread about himself and his enlightenment which proves everyone else wrong because they don't know what he knows and he was once unenlightened like you are...
Yup, that clearly his thing, never state an actual opinion, just waffle about higher thoughts and hope no one realizes that he never actually says anything.
 
Oh yay! Just what we needed, another pissing match thread with fragile egos needing to play the players to prove some form of self worth. Is that why you dragged me in here @Cray?

Based on your previous views, I guess you must be supporting China?

Awkward.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X