Chrome browsing history is so lame

saor

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
42,852
Reaction score
38,235
Location
CPT
Is it just me?
I really like the speed of Chrome etc. but one of the things that drives me crazy is it's inability to recall previously browsed sites from a keyword.

As an example, I clicked on a thread I've never been to in both firefox and chrome:
doggythread.png

Then closed that tab and in a new tab entered a phrase from that link - in this case the word 'dog':

Firefox, there's it is:
dog7491.png

Chrome, wtf:
godchrome.png

There's these little things in Chrome that make it so frustrating to use.
/rant
 
Is it just me?
I really like the speed of Chrome etc. but one of the things that drives me crazy is it's inability to recall previously browsed sites from a keyword.

As an example, I clicked on a thread I've never been to in both firefox and chrome:
View attachment 487158

Then closed that tab and in a new tab entered a phrase from that link - in this case the word 'dog':

Firefox, there's it is:
View attachment 487160

Chrome, wtf:
View attachment 487162

There's these little things in Chrome that make it so frustrating to use.
/rant
Cntr+h for history?
 
[XC] Oj101;20892332 said:
Depending on how much browsing you do, that can be infuriating slow.

The best was Opera (pre-Chromium) where it would even search the content of pages - not just the titles.
This.

In Firefox opening history is instant. Chrome lags behind. Besides, I don't really want to open history all the time...it should just return results based on the keywords typed into the address bar.
 
Chrome doesn't keep a very big history for autocomplete. It also seems to only keep the most frequently visited sites. I use Chrome cause it's currently the best of a bad bunch. Opera 11.xx was still the best.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X