Gothi, for me the problem with climate change as a concept is the same problem I have with modern science. Although the scientific method is inherently reliable, the shaping of results by lobbyists & large corporations with deep pockets have turned the results into a joke.
I'm sure that for every 129 pro climate change reasons you'll find 129 cons stating the exact opposite, with supporting data and facts. Problem is due to climate's global scale those results aren't easy so verify or reproduce, but the bigger budgets get to make the loudest noise, leading to it becoming a question of what you choose to believe rather than what can be proven without a doubt.
.. and that's not really how science's supposed to work