Thank you to everyone who has replied. I have learnt a lot from what you have said.
After reading what Joelus said, it becomes clear that Jacob Zuma has played key roles in South Africas development but does this give him ownership over the country?
We have a political system in this country where a party is voted into power and the head of that party (as voted for by the members of the party) becomes president. It's a form of democracy. Perhaps a form of Aristocracy, meritocracy, plutocracy, oligarchy or corpocracy would suite you better but that's not what we have. Jacob Zuma is where he is because he is popular and in a democracy, popularity is what counts.
I also don't buy this argument that voters are all narrow minded, gullible and uneducated. Many are uneducated but that doesn't mean they are stupid.
Most of the ANC NEC, who put Zuma where he is, are actually highly educated people. Probably more educated than most people on this forum. Likewise, many ANC voters are very well educated.
Just because people see things differently to you and disagree with you doesn't mean they are stupid.
Standard disclaimer: I do not support Zuma for president.