-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: How do you normally pay for purchases in stores?
They said in a briefing they thought it was all meaningless bravado from random folk on the net, they did not actually think they meant it.
alright.
so with everything else they took these random people seriously as portrayed in the media/politicians, but with a threat to their government building its bravado.
then on top of that.
they provide access for them, by opening doors/barricades, for them to enter the building.
allowing them to do exactly as they have been planning to do for weeks.
what did they think the people who wanted to enter the building were planning on doing?
i am honestly trying to make sense of this. it seems unreal.
Same here. Mind boggling.
Americans always seem to be ignorant to security threats. Perhaps it is their hubris?
The 9/11 attacks happened as a result of gross ignorance of real security threats. CIA and FBI knew there was a threat but never expected it to materialise.
RedViking
Nord of the South
Trump and Giuliani will answer all your questions in due time.
yeah could be hubris. then again you would think theyve learned from 911 and their mass shootings and last years riots etc.
if you throw in a tinfoil hat(as its pretty common around 911), these events have far reaching motive. scary thought.
i suppose they put their faith in the good of people instead.
but still with this, they had warning and threats, they people showed up, they were let in. like wtaf.
edit: comparing this to 911, would be like they watched the terrorist board the planes and watched them fly off path and watch them fly into the building, opening the way for them.
yeah i saw something about there being a revelation of truth to be held ..lol
DreamKing
Honorary Master
Pegging
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 26,943
- Reaction score
- 43,496
If there was actual evidence of fraud, they'd have a case.
62 - 1 you can't argue with.
ForceFate
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 51,023
- Reaction score
- 37,727
The Kraken lawsuits failed to take off. Dominion is suing. It's an opportunity for the Kraken whisperer to present her evidence.
DreamKing
Honorary Master
sure, the court even does't cares about any brutally violation of the constitution by the states.
that is fine, I am an american.
Pegging
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 26,943
- Reaction score
- 43,496
sure, the court even does't cares about any brutally violation of the constitution by the states.
that is fine, I am an american.
Which cases are those?
From what I've seen, even Trump appointed judges are throwing things out.
DreamKing
Honorary Master
that is fine also, when dominion lawsuit will be heard, all the evidences will be on the table. and then you will see who is telling lies. I don't understand how stupid they are, they are helping to release the kraken.
ForceFate
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 51,023
- Reaction score
- 37,727
Dominion would not have opted for this route if there was any foul play. Trump can't stand being second best.
TEXTILE GUY
Honorary Master
Political Polarization & Media Habits
Liberals and conservatives turn to and trust strikingly different news sources. And across-the-board liberals and conservatives are more likely than others to interact with like-minded individuals.
www.journalism.org
DreamKing
Honorary Master
that is ok, I don't really care now.
DreamKing
Honorary Master
I don't think we have any argument here. let see the result. let see the evidences. that will be interesting.
TEXTILE GUY
Honorary Master
Gotta love this whole saga - its like the Zuma movie.
Of course, there was only an issue with the states where the winning candidate that lost, lost in and no issues where the winning candidate that lost, won in, and of course, the winning candidate lost and the "loser" won, although the "losers" followers know he won, and the loser is blaming the "loser" for the loss.
Brilliant plot - George Lucas could even conceive such a convoluted plot.
And as for those rigged court cases - except the first one, well, all the judges were biased. The fact of who appointed them doesnt matter. Not only is the electoral system flawed, so too is the judicial system, the security system at the capitol, the social media system and the water cooler in the press room.
And then theres the most important metric - if they REALLY wanted to make America great again, they would process my application for a GC. FFS, at this rate I am going to be booted out in 6 weeks.
Of course, there was only an issue with the states where the winning candidate that lost, lost in and no issues where the winning candidate that lost, won in, and of course, the winning candidate lost and the "loser" won, although the "losers" followers know he won, and the loser is blaming the "loser" for the loss.
Brilliant plot - George Lucas could even conceive such a convoluted plot.
And as for those rigged court cases - except the first one, well, all the judges were biased. The fact of who appointed them doesnt matter. Not only is the electoral system flawed, so too is the judicial system, the security system at the capitol, the social media system and the water cooler in the press room.
And then theres the most important metric - if they REALLY wanted to make America great again, they would process my application for a GC. FFS, at this rate I am going to be booted out in 6 weeks.
