There's about a 70% chance they are gonna charge you for the IS account(well unless you are forced to use one this month again....not looking unlikely)
There's about a 100% chance I would very quickly drop them if they did that! The accounts were supposed to be disabled at midnight, July 31st.
Anyways, it wasn't intentional. I suppose I should have picked up on it sooner, what with the perfect latencies and all.
I had this fear right from the very start, when Cybersmart was announced as the backbone for the ISP. Having experienced very bad gaming latency from those clowns a few years back, you can understand my trepidation when it comes to anything remotely involving them. I hugely suspect that these latency woes stem from that backbone, which is somewhat proven by countless tests and comparative testing using other ISPs.
Here is a pathping to CrystalWeb's site, where you will see 99% packet loss on the second hop.
0 PC [IP Withheld]
1 192.168.1.1
2 105.233.37.1
3 telkom-gw-ipc-up.ctcore.net [196.6.121.38]
4 96.141.ct-dc.ctcore.net [196.41.96.141]
5 * * *
Computing statistics for 100 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 PC [IP Withheld]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 0ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 192.168.1.1
1/ 100 = 1% |
2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 99/ 100 = 99% 105.233.37.1
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 20ms 1/ 100 = 1% 0/ 100 = 0% telkom-gw-ipc-up.ctcore.net [196.6.121.38]
1/ 100 = 1% |
4 19ms 2/ 100 = 2% 0/ 100 = 0% 96.141.ct-dc.ctcore.net [196.41.96.141]
Trace complete.
I will now switch to a free GB and do the same test.