Dead Iraq Puppy Blowback?

So you say that your equivalent to an insect; ant or cockroach?

Just shows your naivety
IMO, not completely, depending on their amount or level of concisenesses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8-Circuit_Model_of_Consciousness, it would be too cruel to kill an animal, if painlessly or not. and the method in which you slaughter sheep is a slow one, and thus brutal, not like the quick way the butchers and modern farmers do it, if they behead a cow, it usually happens so fast that the cow does not have enough time to feel any pain.

Well if you think that shoving a metal rod through the animals head is humane then thats your opinion. I dont think its because its quick for the animal, its mostly quick for the farmer.

IMO we do it the right way.
We feed the animal a little water just before, 3 motions through the 3 main veins. Nothing wrong with that.
 
LOL
There is no 'christian method' how idiotic :D
No, you are. I've never said that, i used inverted commas to show that you were referring to christians, while you yourself buy the same meat they do.
Jews and Muslims still practice ritual slaughter and they are similiar...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritual_slaughter

If you are going to criticize Muslims then do the same for Jews as well.
That is not the case, people are debating the brutality of the war, while this behavior is obligatory for the Iraqis to do occasionally.

And if, you can't read properly: "In Judaism, animal sacrifice was practiced up to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E"
(Their is nothing to criticize. Jews don't sacrifice animals for more than two thousand years. )

your prejudice disgusts me.
You are clearly the prejudice one here, ie, above
[your EDIT:]Your irrational dislike for Muslims I find disgusting.
False and off-topic! I am not irrational, what do you think about the irrational dislike Islam teaches Muslims to have to non-muslims?

Your statements here are clearly bigoted, unfounded and naive.

out
 
Last edited:

Well if you think that shoving a metal rod through the animals head is humane then thats your opinion. I dont think its because its quick for the animal, its mostly quick for the farmer.
.
The animal's brain takes time before it feels pain if it is done that way, so the animal dies before it feels pain. Which is much more humane than leaving the animal to slowly bleed to death. Much action has been taken against this ritualistic way of killing animals, and it is made illegal in many countries.

Nothing wrong with that.
:rolleyes:
 
LOL Dude , From the begining of time we have been slaughtering animals they are a resource a means of food we depend on them for food . LOL so you are trying to force your vegeterian lifestyle on the rest of us ? I love animals so tasty I rather bite a sheep than eat some green stuff I know that muslims way of slaughtering is the quickest and most painless , What about people who hunted for food , dude I think You should form a Chicken rights group and any slaughtering of chickens is murder and In-Chickane.
*sigh*

. It is also cheaper, if it were, slaughter houses everywhere would rather use that method, but it clearly isn't so, they don't. In contrast between the two it is the method, it is a cruel and painful way to kill animals, the non-muslim method is much better, as it is so fast, the animal does not feel pain, the muslim method does prolong the animals suffering, RSPCA has banned this method in many countries ie. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/307714.stm

and the you can't compare people's past morality to prove that something is ok, this is not progression, it was harsh back then too, but we are living in the present, were their are better alternatives, which some people irrationally don't want to take, this is where the problem lies.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X