Didn't CT bid for the right to host the Olympic Games a while back? Let's say they won the bid, where were they going to host the Olympics?
Funny enough, massive overspending on the Olympics is touted as one of the reasons for the the current Greek bankruptcy.
In fact the only definite profit making games in the last 40 years were in Los Angeles where (colour me effing suprised) they used old stadia.
Now then Mila and co. (and Cape Town Guy, I'm sure he will be along soon enough) etc. I'm not sure what your background is, whether you are tied to the WC stadia or the bid, whether you studied or are interested in economics, what income group you fall into, how you vote.
But know this:
These stadia will be funded by the taxpayer. Remember (nb. lesson for CTG) that when government pays for something, it is not Governments money, it is our money, the taxpayers. Any expenses by government must come from some source, whether it be increased tax or taking from social spending.
My problem with you guys is that you never have any criticism for any part of the building, planning or in fact for any part of our preparations for the WC.
Contrary to your belief the vast majority of World Cup preparation critics on this forum are in fact excited by the coming World Cup. We are however worried about what we consider massive overspending on stadia and other frivolous spending. Also take into account our reservations about where and how the money is spent - such as upgrading Greenpoint (already rich) vs Athlone (poor) vs Newlands (already existing).
I can only put your absolute support for anything and everything the WC planners have done down to possible economic naivety, youthfulness and possible political partisanry.
I am sure the Word cup is going to be an absolute success. I am however very worried about the Post party.