Ek haat Telkom!

From WA:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 63 received, 37% packet loss, time 19846ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.194/196.533/199.629/0.908 ms, ipg/ewma 200.465/196.580 ms

From Mweb Uncapped:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 29330ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.580/287.666/419.723/37.754 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 296.266/276.215 ms

From Hetzner DE:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 19811ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 14.309/14.989/15.764/0.282 ms, ipg/ewma 200.111/15.104 ms
 
Pellito said:
From WA:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 63 received, 37% packet loss, time 19846ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.194/196.533/199.629/0.908 ms, ipg/ewma 200.465/196.580 ms

From Mweb Uncapped:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 29330ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.580/287.666/419.723/37.754 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 296.266/276.215 ms

From Hetzner DE:
--- fr1.wtfast.com ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 19811ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 14.309/14.989/15.764/0.282 ms, ipg/ewma 200.111/15.104 ms
Click to expand...

So it's $#@&*^ing WA again.

37% loss. gg
 
Pinging my own box via WA is fine, It's sitting in germany.

--- owkkuri.za.net ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 21005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 205.109/209.920/213.726/0.939 ms, pipe 2, ipg/ewma 212.177/209.509 ms
 
From my 4Mbps Mweb uncapped account in CPT:

Pinging fr1.wtfast.com [87.98.215.166] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=52
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=52
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=52
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 87.98.215.166:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 169ms, Maximum = 170ms, Average = 169ms
 
From my 4mbps Telkom account in CPT

Pinging fr1.wtfast.com [87.98.215.166] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=50
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=228ms TTL=50
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=50
Reply from 87.98.215.166: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 87.98.215.166:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 227ms, Maximum = 262ms, Average = 242ms
 
nakedhousee said:
cho'gall is not even hard :P jus stand still. nuke. p2 spread out , nuke.
Click to expand...

Combustion? Blood of the old God? Corrupted Adherent? Worship? It's probably the most movement intensive fight after the stupid Ascendant Council in Bastion of Twilight for a melee DPS. If he is ranged he might get away with it, but melee carry the fight in this encounter.
 
S7wede said:
Combustion? Blood of the old God? Corrupted Adherent? Worship? It's probably the most movement intensive fight after the stupid Ascendant Council in Bastion of Twilight for a melee DPS. If he is ranged he might get away with it, but melee carry the fight in this encounter.
Click to expand...

Melee hardly! carry cho'gall. least in our guild. they hug the bosses ass from 100% to 0% , and the range move and interupt and kill all adds. most movement melee do is to the shadow lords to kill them while range is on the adherents :P
 
Agreed... No idea what S7wede is smoking but its definately quality stuff... Melee carrying ranged on chogal ??? Holy crap thats one fight with tons of movement where ranged have to switched to slime nuking, slowing the slimes, ensuring the adds are picked up correctly upon spawn time, nuking tenticles in the final phase. Come on dude... lets be honest.... Cata hasnt been exactly friendly towards melee dps in current tier of raiding hey ?
Any encounter with loads of target switching, melee suffers... Cho'gal is no exception.

Its more the other way around... more and more raid leaders are stacking high on ranged dps.
 
Last edited:
SnowWar said:
true true,

Melee is there to interrupt :p
Click to expand...

I am melee! Hard to interrupt with 3k ms:P Our raid leader let be stay on boss the whole time during 1st phase though, so everything went better than expected. Also, this wasn't a tactic topic >_>. I was raging about broken interwebz, thankfully it seems much better today. Pings are back to normal.
 
Last edited:
melee interupt :O ? drugs are bad kids! , shadow nova or w/e from lock for MC's ( 3 locks ftw ! , 2 in each grp an 1 in melee camp )

for us hunters take the first interupt. then an ele solo's 1 and mages rotate on other. melee jus lol move left an rite on boss :( like every other fight nearly. sad face!
 
nakedhousee said:
melee interupt :O ? drugs are bad kids! , shadow nova or w/e from lock for MC's ( 3 locks ftw ! , 2 in each grp an 1 in melee camp )

for us hunters take the first interupt. then an ele solo's 1 and mages rotate on other. melee jus lol move left an rite on boss :( like every other fight nearly. sad face!
Click to expand...

Depends on your group setup of course :)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X