Airbus take the opposite view of how their aircraft should look in 2050.
That's a no from me. I'd rather spend the whole flight in the tiny toilet.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Airbus take the opposite view of how their aircraft should look in 2050.
My claustrophobia and (crowd) anxiety just shot through the roof reading about it.
Ever walked through a narrow, unilluminated tunnel?
I can make myself do stuff. But the thought of an plane is already a freaky one for me now telling me an hour in a thing with no windows.
no no. nee nee. I might release the flying monkeys and then we are going to be on the news and the papprazi and everybody will have to sign NDAs nope.![]()
I can make myself do stuff. But the thought of an plane is already a freaky one for me now telling me an hour in a thing with no windows.
no no. nee nee. I might release the flying monkeys and then we are going to be on the news and the papprazi and everybody will have to sign NDAs nope.![]()
The flat earthers will love this.... easier to hide the truth !
Comic Sans...
I would say windows would cause more safety issues than they solve in terms of the structural weaknesses they introduce.
Can they not put monitors where the windows should be and stream an outside camera to them ...
Can they not put monitors where the windows should be and stream an outside camera to them ...
Instead of being able to see directly outside, passengers view images projected in from outside the aircraft using fibre-optic cameras.
For me its the ability to see. I'm also not bothered to be in scuba gear or snorkeling.But those windows aren't there to let fresh air in, normally if they are letting air in for any reason, you're probably in serious trouble.
Because people (like most animals) don't like being in confined spaces. Windows give the illusion the plane is much bigger than it is.they why dont they take a cargo plane, and fly people in that?
light dimmed before takeoff,
https://www.cntraveler.com/story/the-real-reason-planes-dim-the-lights-during-takeoff-and-landing“You want your eyes acclimated,” says Jon Lewis, a senior pilot with a major U.S. airline. “During nighttime takeoffs and landings, you dim the lights so that you have some night vision going on.” Dimming cabin lights during the day, then, is less necessary, but does conserve some engine power as the plane hurtles toward flight. (Less taxation on the engine means an aircraft can shorten its takeoff roll, or when a plane is aligned with a runway centerline and will soon become airborne.)
Airplane power aside, the primary reason for a change in cabin lights is directly connected to why crewmembers ask passengers to raise their shades: safety in case of an emergency. It can take our eyes between ten and 30 minutes to fully adjust to a dark setting, reports The Telegraph, which means that dimming the lights can help eyes pre-adjust to lower light. And if it’s night when everyone must suddenly evacuate, those several seconds it takes for your eyes to calibrate to low-light conditions are precious, and can make all the difference in safely exiting the aircraft. In dimmer light, emergency lighting and illuminated pathways will be more visible, too.
I don't think all windows will be replaced. I think having a window on the door is pretty logical.even a strap tied across the window of the door for this very purpose.
Because people (like most animals) don't like being in confined spaces. Windows give the illusion the plane is much bigger than it is.
https://www.cntraveler.com/story/the-real-reason-planes-dim-the-lights-during-takeoff-and-landing
I don't think all windows will be replaced. I think having a window on the door is pretty logical.
I have never seen one troepie not making the Flossie flights in bygone days. Windows were not a luxury in C160 and C130 aircrafts.![]()