Evolution of the eye

[Chemical]

Just found this:

Many creationists often cite the eye as something that appears too complex to be produced by evolution (and therefore requiring a designer). Here Liz exposes the flaw in this line of thinking with professor Richard Dawkins.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOoADff9PRU

 

[reedOsama]

irreducible complexity.... bio 101

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye

that chick's sooOo hot

 

[FrankCastle]

that chick's sooOo hot

I want to know how her lips evolved.

 

[reedOsama]

I want to know how her lips evolved.

*witty retort that I couldn't think of*

that accent makes my jeans tighten

 

[Chemical]

*witty retort that I couldn't think of*

that accent makes my jeans tighten

Maybe if more science documentaries had presenters like this, we would not have some of the weird notions that come up in PD.

 

[porchrat]

LOL to get the discussion off the hot presenter:
Brilliant video. It presented the information in a way that would be easy for anyone to follow and it kept my interest all the way through. Although Richard Dawkins was probably more responsible for that. Say what you want about the man but you cannot deny that he knows his subject well and is therefore very good at explaining it in a simple and engaging fashion.

This looks to be part of an entire series sort of like a more sciencey British equivalent of myth busters. Am I right?

 

[Ninja'd]

Can't see the vid. Are our eyes going to evolve so that one day we'll have Sharingan eyes?

 

[h0ll0w]

People are still raving about mount impossible ?

 

[Chemical]

This looks to be part of an entire series sort of like a more sciencey British equivalent of myth busters. Am I right?

Yes, its from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00lwxj1