F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

lol


That part in bold covers exactly all the strawman arguments you tools have been moaning about. If Facebook is lawful content, then they have stated they won't slow it down. What it is missing is the feel good statements that ObamaNet required.

What a crock :crylaugh:.

Comcast deleted net neutrality pledge the same day FCC announced repeal

Starting in 2014, the webpage, corporate.comcast.com/openinternet/open-net-neutrality, contained this statement: "Comcast doesn't prioritize Internet traffic or create paid fast lanes."

That statement remained on the page until April 26 of this year, according to page captures from the Internet Archive's WayBack Machine.

But on April 27, the paid prioritization pledge was nowhere to be found on that page and remains absent now.

What changed? It was on April 26 that FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced the first version of his plan to eliminate net neutrality rules. Since then, Pai has finalized his repeal plan, and the FCC will vote to drop the rules on December 14.

Notice how the current pledge contains no promise related to paid prioritization, one of the three major activities outlawed by the current net neutrality rules. (Blocking and throttling are the others.)

Parts of Comcast's net neutrality statement changed from promises about what it will do in the future to statements about what it does in the present. While the Comcast webpage used to say that it "won't" block or throttle lawful Internet content, it now says that "We do not block, slow down or discriminate against lawful content."
 
Internal FCC Report Shows Republican Net Neutrality Narrative Is False

The story of net neutrality as an Obama-led takeover of the internet was refuted by an Inspector General investigation whose findings were not made public prior to Thursday’s vote.

A core Republican talking point during the net neutrality battle was that, in 2015, President Obama led a government takeover of the internet, and Obama illegally bullied the independent Federal Communications Commission into adopting the rules. In this version of the story, Ajit Pai’s rollback of those rules Thursday is a return to the good old days, before the FCC was forced to adopt rules it never wanted in the first place.

“On express orders from the previous White House, the FCC scrapped the tried-and-true, light touch regulation of the Internet and replaced it with heavy-handed micromanagement,” Pai said Thursday prior to voting to repeal the regulations.

But internal FCC documents obtained by Motherboard using a Freedom of Information Act request show that the independent, nonpartisan FCC Office of Inspector General—acting on orders from Congressional Republicans—investigated the claim that Obama interfered with the FCC’s net neutrality process and found it was nonsense. This Republican narrative of net neutrality as an Obama-led takeover of the internet, then, was wholly refuted by an independent investigation and its findings were not made public prior to Thursday’s vote.

More lies from Repubs.
 
Both sides lie. Both sides are hopelessly enmeshed in partisan politics.

In the end, what really matters, is that a layer of government control and regulation has been removed. At least for now.

That's a good thing.

Only one side lies consistently.
 
Only one side lies consistently.
All politicians lie, it is part of the nature of the beast. If you can’t play forces and interests off against each other while screwing the people who vote for you, then you won’t get very far.
 
FCC chairman Ajit Pai faces the possibility of multiple copyright infringement lawsuits and millions of dollars in damages.

One ill-conceived video could cost FCC chairman Ajit Pai a lot of money. That is, potentially millions of dollars in damages involving multiple litigants.

This morning, at least one copyright owner vowed to launch a major lawsuit against Pai, the Federal Communications Commission, or both. The video has already amassed millions of views across Facebook, YouTube, and other outlets.
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/12/15/fcc-ajit-pai-copyright-infringement/

Haha chop. Hope he does get nailed.
 
Fair use doctrine will probably come into play.

How on earth is it fair use? There is no interpretation of the law that makes it legal to use music / images etc in that way without permission. Fair use is incredibly narrow in its definition and most people don't understand it at all and misuse use it to justify copyright infringements.

To all intents and purposes fair use is limited to reporting - so you can repeat something as part of a news report and comment - so you can take a portion of a book or film for the purpose of review, parody or comment. And pretty much nothing else. An advert falls into neither category.
 
Last edited:
If this affects America only, why care ?

Fast and slow lanes in the US apply not just to consumers, but to other smaller ISPs providing services, to companies providing access to their infrastructure, and to overseas customers as well. It will affect data routing through the US over time, and may affect how some small businesses might conduct themselves on the internet because they might not be able to access their own services on a slower lane.

Think about it in terms of Steam. If Comcast starts to throttle Steam downloads because Valve doesn't pay the fee for fast lane access, it will end up in consumers complaining, blaming both parties, and sales will fall as a result.
 
Last edited:
And to Arthur:

As long as all regulations and laws allowing for a monopoly to exist in any geographic area were also removed, then it's an OK move. It should be totally free market (with no private sector companies trying to lobby any level of government policy).

This.

In my area, I have 2 choices. And one is Adsl at dismal speeds.


It cost billions to put in the infrastructure for a broadband network

People also forget some of the things companies have done...
https://www.sutori.com/story/the-history-of-net-neutrality-in-the-u-s
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X