jansdejager
Expert Member
FO3 really felt like they wanted to make it into a co-op but didn't feel the time was right. Elder Scrolls online came around so they'll probably do the same for FO once they've milked the single player modes to death.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
/Looks at trailer
/Sees more Bethesda Gamebryo trash
Oh well.
I hope this is not true. I expected them to use an upgraded version of the engine used for Skyrim.
It clearly looks different.
View attachment 222144
Go watch the video again and tell me they look the same.
Good god man, FO 3/NV had PS2 graphics, this one looks totally different.
Apparently I'm not the only one that's underwhelmed.
Apparently I'm not the only one that's underwhelmed.
Slightly higher res textures and a few more lighting effects. That's it. Otherwise it's pretty much the same thing. Some of those scenes in the trailer looked pretty much identical to FO3.
GameBryo should have been taken out back and shot years ago.
probably ps3 footage
He disagreed with you.
LOL
It’s impossible to say without asking Bethesda, but just watching the trailer, I’d wager Fallout 4‘s still using Bethesda’s Creation engine (created for Skyrim), doubtless souped up, but still looking more like a tricked out, high-resolution version of Fallout 3 than a radical graphical leap (as you’d generally see when this much time’s passed between installments).
System requirements?
Anything that can run Crysis 2.
I disagree.
To me it clearly looks different.
I spent enough time in the fallout series to feel this.