Fancy interior vs pretty exterior

The reality is that we spend 99% of our time inside the car unable to see what it looks like.

So yes if it was a case of one car vs another and especially in relation to price the interior would be more important.

However without having exact examples it's not quite black and white.
 
If I can't have both, i'd rather have a plain and Ok interior and exterior, hence my well known gripe with the Toyota Etios, it's Ok on the outside but extremely horrible inside.
 
Well this is why I have no idea why people buy Toyotas , they look crap exterior and interior.
 
Sepeng said:
Yeah I know we want it all but...
If a car had a really pretty interior, would you forgive it's hideous exterior?
Alternatively if a car was the automotive version of Scarlett Johansson but had a really plain/ ugly interior, would you still go for it?

Basically which do you prefer - how a car looks on the inside or the outside?
Click to expand...
I prefer a balance of both.

I often find myself drooling at the exterior of some Alfa Romeos, but then I see their interiors and I want to throw-up. Although the new Guilia is changing that.

Jaguar Land Rover Group prove you can have both, that new Range Rover Velar, the Jaguar F-Pace, XF and XE all have gorgeous interiors and exteriors.
 
Tsepz_011 said:
I prefer a balance of both.

I often find myself drooling at the exterior of some Alfa Romeos, but then I see their interiors and I want to throw-up. Although the new Guilia is changing that.

Jaguar Land Rover Group prove you can have both, that new Range Rover Velar, the Jaguar F-Pace, XF and XE all have gorgeous interiors and exteriors.
Click to expand...

You are probably referring to the 159. Those cars are eye wateringly beautiful on the outside. Inside looks junk.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X