Ok, this is a basic question, but it needs to be asked:
DSL was introduced in SA with significant limitations from the get-go: Low speeds, usage thresholds, throttling. All in the name of limiting scarcity of bandwidth. Even with the introduction of Seacom and other submarine cables, these limits have not been removed. (some have been increased, but still...)
Now fibre is being rolled out, with absolutely no throttling, usage caps or other limitations.
What gives? Both fibre and DSL runs over the same undersea cables and shares some of the backbone links.
Why is DSL crippled? What's different with fibre that not even the cheapest Fibre ISP is talking about limits and throttling?
DSL was introduced in SA with significant limitations from the get-go: Low speeds, usage thresholds, throttling. All in the name of limiting scarcity of bandwidth. Even with the introduction of Seacom and other submarine cables, these limits have not been removed. (some have been increased, but still...)
Now fibre is being rolled out, with absolutely no throttling, usage caps or other limitations.
What gives? Both fibre and DSL runs over the same undersea cables and shares some of the backbone links.
Why is DSL crippled? What's different with fibre that not even the cheapest Fibre ISP is talking about limits and throttling?