Flood Wall Street

mmmig said:
I think they thought they were already gathered for the UN climate summit to show that climate change is a major issue for normal people they might has well march down to Wall Street since they are in the neighbourhood
Click to expand...

The same normal people who refuse to give up all their trappings but think a march will solve it all I suppose. Hippies pffft.
 
It seems that the US big 3 news channels have a telling lack of coverage of the march despite the fact 300 000 people turned up for the march

[video=youtube;TgWOFv-XA3k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWOFv-XA3k[/video]
 
Arthur said:
Not at all. I'm a keen environmentalist who runs his house and business on renewables. I use low-energy devices wherever I can. I passionately believe in living in harmony with Nature.

I wonder why you'd think a person's views on this or any other issue are coloured by their employment ... are yours? Do you work for a solar PV company? The thought wouldn't even occur to me, frankly.
Click to expand...
Well OrbitalDawn made a claim that you could be a climate change denier and when I think climate change denier I think petroleum industry
 
mmmig said:
It seems that the US big 3 news channels have a telling lack of coverage of the march despite the fact 300 000 people turned up for the march

[video=youtube;TgWOFv-XA3k]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgWOFv-XA3k[/video]
Click to expand...

Eh...

CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/21/us/new-york-climate-change-march/

NBC: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/thousands-march-climate-change-united-nations-summit-n208356

ABC: http://abcnews.go.com/US/york-sees-biggest-climate-march-history/story?id=25659229

Even Faux News: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/09/21/new-york-climate-march-attracts-over-310000-people/
 
 
OrbitalDawn said:
Sure, Arthur. :rolleyes:

You are a anthropogenic climate change denier. Your previous post confirms it.
Click to expand...
As at least a hundred posts clarify, I do NOT deny climate change. I am not convinced that we human beings have anything to do with the changing climate. The difference is not hard to parse, surely.
 
Arthur said:
As at least a hundred posts clarify, I do NOT deny climate change. I am not convinced that we human beings have anything to do with the changing climate. The difference is not hard to parse, surely.
Click to expand...

Great. Thanks for confirming, once again, that you're a anthropogenic climate change denier.
 
Arthur said:
As at least a hundred posts clarify, I do NOT deny climate change. I am not convinced that we human beings have anything to do with the changing climate. The difference is not hard to parse, surely.
Click to expand...
97% scientists disagree with you and the 3% that agree with you work for the oil, coal and other industries that cause co2 emissions
 
mmmig said:
97% scientists disagree with you and the 3% that agree with you work for the oil, coal and other industries that cause co2 emissions
Click to expand...
Not sure why people bother.

Arthur is a proven liar. He also believes some truly whacky stuff. Iirc he said the earth would be able to accommodate 50 billion people with no issues.
 
mmmig said:
97% scientists disagree with you and the 3% that agree with you work for the oil, coal and other industries that cause co2 emissions
Click to expand...
There are threads to discuss all this. It's been done ad nauseum.

As to scientific consensus: Tales are too numerous to mention, but a recent one is Helicobacter pylori. Just a short few years ago, 99.9% of medical scientists thought Barry Marshall and Robert Warren were completely wrong about gastic ulcers, so much so that they were hounded out of scientific circles and labelled quacks. The 2005 Nobel vindicated them fully - the 99% consensus was wrong. It's the story of science.
 
Arthur said:
That is because for people like Randhir, those who disagree with his views are liars. He cannot conceive of any universe other than the one his own benighted views affirm.

Your slur is detestable. Shame on you.
Click to expand...

Nope, that ain't why. It's actually quite dishonest of you to insinuate that's why he's saying you're a liar.
 
Arthur said:
There are threads to discuss all this. It's been done ad nauseum.

As to scientific consensus: Tales are too numerous to mention, but a recent one is Helicobacter pylori. Just a short few years ago, 99.9% of medical scientists thought Barry Marshall and Robert Warren were completely wrong about gastic ulcers, so much so that they were hounded out of scientific circles and labelled quacks. The 2005 Nobel vindicated them fully - the 99% consensus was wrong. It's the story of science.
Click to expand...
you can believe what you want believe it's not going to change the facts
 
Randhir said:
Not sure why people bother.

Arthur is a proven liar. He also believes some truly whacky stuff. Iirc he said the earth would be able to accommodate 50 billion people with no issues.
Click to expand...

but have we TESTED this theory? :p i'm pretty sure it's possible with some creativity :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X