<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by microfast</i>
<br />Something for Free from Telkom .......... mmmmmm..
I must be missing something, surely this genuine "Free
offer" from Telkom is the answer to all my ADSL problems.
I just cannot figure this one out [?] [?] [V]
Obviously I am misinformed. Please could someone
enlighten me.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
...Hold a moment while the ancient madala creakily mounts his hobby horse ...
Hey man - it is your Internet ACCOUNT that is capped.
This has zilch to do with ADSL or WIFI.
You cannot be blamed for your confusion, Telkom's flim-flam has deliberately confused the issue.
Say after me.
Three times:
"Capping is an ISP function."
"ADSL is a carrier function."
Is that clear?
Telkom wants the whole enchilada. They want to leverage their legislated control of carrier function into exclusive control of what are ISP functions.
Telkom have succeeded in convincing most of us (through product bundling, labeling and semantic dishonesy) that ADSL is not just the connection from your home to the exchange, but includes the sale and control of bandwidth and Internet connectivity.
This is not so. ADSL is the connection from your premises to the exchange - end of story.
Internet services you buy from an Internet Service Provider. There are lots of them, and you get to pick and choose, and to make deals. This is called competition. Competition is a GOOD THING to everyone except monopolists, so guess who HATES this idea?
In other countries ISPs may, by law, station their own DSLAMs in PTT exchanges. The PTT, in exchange, retains its historical advantage - only they may provide and rent out the 'last mile' copper connection. ISP control of the DSLAM is quite important, because a lot of the client billing info comes from the DSLAM. This is business between the client and ISP, and has nothing to do with the carrier, whose interest is confined to providing the copper pair from subscriber to exchange, guaranteeing that it maintains the connection, and nothing more.
The PTT is permitted to establish an ISP, but that ISP must transparently pay the same rate to the carrier as does any other ISP.
WIFI is a kind of grey area, but Telkom would just LOVE to convince us that in SA it is their exclusive prerogative to supply it, PLUS the associated ISP services, as they have done with ADSL. IANAL, but my understanding is that Telkom gets to control any communication across property boundaries. (You may not wave to your neighbour over the fence without a license). If this is so their case is a bit wobbly within an hotel, but probably stronger on a boulevard or square.
Can somebody more knowedgeable fill us in?