From bad to worse?

[Drastik]

I raced home from work today in anticipation that based on last nights slight increase in performance the remaining 20 Meg of a DL I have been waiting for would have completed.

NO SUCH LUCK!

Back to where we were!!! My ping results are as follows: 100% signal all the time. Northcliff!!

Local Ping Result
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=390ms TTL=126

International Ping Result
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=1108ms TTL=44
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=1202ms TTL=44
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=1109ms TTL=44
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=1812ms TTL=44
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=1826ms TTL=44

Am I on my own?

 

[Gatecrasher]

Seems good right now:

>ping 196.30.31.120

Pinging 196.30.31.120 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=126
Reply from 196.30.31.120: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=126

Ping statistics for 196.30.31.120:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 71ms, Average = 52ms

>ping 207.201.128.145

Pinging 207.201.128.145 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=356ms TTL=45
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=390ms TTL=45
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=45
Reply from 207.201.128.145: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=45

Ping statistics for 207.201.128.145:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 356ms, Maximum = 390ms, Average = 369ms

 

[Drastik]

Thanks Gatecrasher, I just wish I could say the same.