Gadaffi Sodomized

OK, so now I'm an ironical, hypocritical troll in your eyes. Great :D

Seeing as you and Alan seem to both sing from the same hymn sheet, I will continue to treat whatever you post with a pinch of salt - let's leave it at that.

@copacetic - I have just spent the last hour reading everything I can about Glenn Greenwald, and I apologise for thinking that he was a Republican. He is neither Republican nor Democrat, which I find refreshing. I will follow whatever else he writes with interest.

lol only person on the planet who thought he was a republican. Then again you thought Hugo Chavez was "right wing"

Anyway since you're now a fan...


Barack Obama is gutting the core principles of the Democratic party


But in 2009, clear signs emerged that President Obama was eager to achieve what his right-predecessor could not: cut social security. Before he was even inaugurated, Obama echoed the right's manipulative rhetorical tactic: that (along with Medicare) the programme was in crisis and producing "red ink as far as the eye can see." President-elect Obama thus vowed that these crown jewels of his party since the New Deal would be, as Politico reported, a "central part" of his efforts to reduce the deficit.

The next month, his top economic adviser, the Wall Street-friendly Larry Summers, also vowed specific benefit cuts to Time magazine. He then stacked his "deficit commission" with long-time advocates of social security cuts.

Many progressives, ebullient over the election of a Democratic president, chose to ignore these preliminary signs, unwilling to believe that their own party's leader was as devoted as he claimed to attacking the social safety net. But some were more realistic. The popular liberal blogger and economist Duncan "Atrios" Black, who was one of the leaders of the campaign against Bush's privatisation scheme, vowed in response to these early reports:

The left ... will create an epic 360-degree ****storm if Obama and the Dems decide that cutting social security benefits is a good idea.

Fast forward to 2011: it is now beyond dispute that President Obama not only favours, but is the leading force in Washington pushing for, serious benefit cuts to both social security and Medicare.

The same Democratic president who supported the transfer of $700bn to bail out Wall Street banks, who earlier this year signed an extension of Bush's massive tax cuts for the wealthy, and who has escalated America's bankruptcy-inducing posture of Endless War, is now trying to reduce the debt by cutting benefits for America's most vulnerable – at the exact time that economic insecurity and income inequality are at all-time highs.
Therein lies one of the most enduring attributes of Obama's legacy: in many crucial areas, he has done more to subvert and weaken the left's political agenda than a GOP president could have dreamed of achieving. So potent, so overarching, are tribal loyalties in American politics that partisans will support, or at least tolerate, any and all policies their party's leader endorses – even if those policies are ones they long claimed to loathe.

This dynamic has repeatedly emerged in numerous contexts. Obama has continued Bush/Cheney terrorism policies – once viciously denounced by Democrats – of indefinite detention, renditions, secret prisons by proxy, and sweeping secrecy doctrines.

He has gone further than his predecessor by waging an unprecedented war on whistleblowers, seizing the power to assassinate U.S. citizens without due process far from any battlefield, massively escalating drone attacks in multiple nations, and asserting the authority to unilaterally prosecute a war (in Libya) even in defiance of a Congressional vote against authorising the war.

And now he is devoting all of his presidential power to cutting the entitlement programmes that have been the defining hallmark of the Democratic party since Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal. The silence from progressive partisans is defeaning – and depressing, though sadly predictable.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jul/21/barack-obama-social-security-cuts
 
During war people do stupid things. Even though he was a mean bastard, he did not deserve to be shot like an animal.
How do you know he was shot like an animal.Maybe he posed a threat to the rebels so they took him out.If one man can cause so much destruction,bloodshed and controversy who knows what else he was capacble of.
 
Desperate Al-Islam ‘wants a plane’

Looks like Gaddafi's son, that was so pompous when he appeared shaking hands with supporters in the street when the rumours broke that he was captured, is now fearful of flagpole up his bung hole.

http://www.iol.co.za/news/africa/desperate-al-islam-wants-a-plane-1.1166503
Desperate Al-Islam ‘wants a plane’

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, fearing for his life if captured in Libya, has tried to arrange for an aircraft to fly him out of his desert refuge and into the custody of the Hague war crimes court, a Libyan official said on Thursday.

Details were sketchy and confirmation not available but a picture has built up since his father's grisly killing while in the hands of vengeful rebel fighters a week ago that suggests Muammar Gaddafi's 39-year-old heir-apparent has taken refuge among Sahara nomads and is seeking a safe haven abroad.

Even if he can still draw on some of the vast fortune the Gaddafi clan built up abroad during 42 years in control of North Africa's main oilfields, his indictment by the International Criminal Court at The Hague over his efforts to crush the revolt limits the options open to Saif al-Islam.

That may explain an apparent willingness, in communications monitored by intelligence services and shared with Libya's interim rulers, to discuss a surrender to the ICC, whereas his mother and surviving siblings simply fled to Algeria and Niger.

The Court, which relies on signatory states to hand over suspects, said it was trying to confirm the whereabouts and intentions of Saif al-Islam and ex-intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senussi, the third man indicted along with the elder Gaddafi.

A source with Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC), which drove the Gaddafis from power in Tripoli in August, told Reuters the two surviving indictees were together, protected by Tuareg nomads, in the rugged wilderness of the “Triangle”, close to the borders of Algeria and Niger.

“Saif is concerned about his safety,” the source said. “He believes handing himself over is the best option for him.”

The younger Gaddafi, once seen as a potential liberal reformer but who adopted a belligerent, win-or-die persona at his father's side this year, was looking for help from abroad, possibly Algeria or Tunisia, to fly out and take his chances at The Hague, where there is no death penalty:

“He wants to be sent an aircraft,” the NTC source said by telephone from Libya. “He wants assurances.”

ICC spokesperson Fadi El Abdallah said the court was trying to confirm the NTC comments and work out how to move the suspects:

“It depends where the suspect is and how we can get into contact with him and what would be necessary to bring him to The Hague. There are different scenarios,” El Abdallah said.

Some observers question the accuracy of NTC information, given frequent lapses in intelligence recently. Some suggest surrendering to the ICC may be only one option for Saif al-Islam, who may hope for a welcome in one of the African states on which his father lavished gifts.

The African Union, and powerful members like South Africa, grumble about the nine-year-old ICC's focus so far on Africans and some of them may prove sympathetic. Even if arrested on charges relating to his role in attacks on protesters in February and March, Saif al-Islam could make defence arguments that might limit any sentence, lawyers said.

NTC forces, which overran Gaddafi's last bastions of Bani Walid and Sirte this month, lack the resources to hunt and capture fugitives deep in the desert, the source said.

Nato, whose air power turned the civil war in the rebels' favour, could help, he added.

But Nato, whose UN mandate is ending now that Muammar Gaddafi is dead, stresses its mission is to protect civilians, not target individuals - though it was a Nato air strike that halted Muammar Gaddafi's flight last week. Even Nato resources would be stretched in the trackless waste of southern Libya.

A captured pro-Gaddafi fighter at Bani Walid told Reuters that the London-educated Saif al-Islam had been in that town, south of Tripoli until it fell earlier this month.

The man, one of his bodyguards, said the younger Gaddafi was “confused” and in fear for his life when he escaped Bani Walid. If he has seen the gruesome video footage of his father's capture, he knows how he may be treated if he remains in Libya.

Asked what the NTC was doing to co-operate with the ICC, the vice-chairperson of the Council, Abdel Hafiz Ghoga, noted that the Libyans still hoped to try the suspects themselves:

“There aren't any special arrangements by the NTC,” he said. “If Abdullah al-Senussi and Saif al-Islam are arrested inside Libya they will be tried and judged based on Libyan law.

“If they fled and went to countries such as Niger, for example, they will have to be surrendered to the ICC,” he adding, noting reports that Senussi had already reached Niger.

Earlier this week, an NTC official said Saif al-Islam had acquired a passport in a false name and was lying low south of Ghat, a border crossing with Algeria through which his mother, sister and two of his surviving brothers fled in August.

Algeria is not a signatory to the Rome treaty which set up the ICC, but might face strong diplomatic pressure to hand over indicted suspects. The NTC has also been pressing Algiers to hand over the other Gaddafi relatives.

Niger, an impoverished former French colony, has said it would honour its commitments to the ICC. The mayor of the northern Niger town of Agadez, a transit point for other fleeing Gaddafi allies, told Reuters Saif al-Islam would be extradited to The Hague if he showed up.

Tunisia, to where other Gaddafi loyalists have fled, is also a signatory to the ICC's conventions.

A member of the Malian parliament who has been in charge of relations with Libya's NTC discounted reports that Gaddafi and Senussi had crossed Algeria or Niger into Mali.

The mystery over their flight has spawned many rumours.

In South Africa, one newspaper said a plane was on standby there to fly north and rescue Saif al-Islam along with a group of South Africans working for him. NTC officials say South Africans may have been among those killed in Sirte last week when Gaddafi was caught and killed.
 
Was amusinig seeing leftwing 'intellectuals' shock when he abandoned them to join his daddy.

The son of the Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi has called for greater democracy in global governance, writing in his doctoral dissertation.

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi said the current system of global governance was "highly undemocratic".

He hit out at undemocratic states whose governments were "authoritarian, abusive and unrepresentative".

His father Muammar Gaddafi came to power in a coup in 1969 and has ruled Libya for 40 years.

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, 37, continues to play a prominent role within the Libyan political landscape.

He reportedly helped negotiate the release by the Scottish government of the dying Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds.



I shall be primarily concerned with what I argue is the central failing of the current system of global governance in the new global environment: that it is highly undemocratic

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi

He spent four years researching his 428-page thesis while studying at the London School of Economics, according to the Times of London newspaper.

The dissertation is called "The Role of Civil Society in the Democratisation of Global Governance Institutions: From Soft Power to Collective Decision Making?"

Mr Gaddafi wrote: "I shall be primarily concerned with what I argue is the central failing of the current system of global governance in the new global environment: that it is highly undemocratic."

He continued that his dissertation would "analyse the problem of how to create more just and democratic global governing institutions", focusing on the importance of the role of "civil society".

'Strong moral reasons'

Mr Gaddafi wrote that elected representatives should be introduced into non-governmental organisations, and that would result in more democratic global governance.

He argued that there were "strong moral reasons to look at reform of the World Trade Organization" because he said power was too concentrated in the hands of a few northern states.

Muammar Gaddafi
Colonel Gaddafi came to power in a bloodless coup in 1969

Although being seen as helping to repair relations with the US during the Presidency of George W Bush, he was critical of Mr Bush.

He described the US as the "new Leviathan" and wrote that the "behaviour of the Bush Administration does not invalidate the liberal view that we can build meaningful international rule by law and institutions based on expectations and reciprocal obligations".

Mr Gaddafi hired consultants Monitor Group to carry out a survey of non-governmental organisation (NGOs), which provided data for his thesis.

He ended: "I believe the evidence presented in this thesis suggests that the collective decision-making approach has real potential and deserves further examination."

Saif al-Islam is the second oldest of the Libyan leader's seven sons, but has denied reports he is likely to succeed his father.

He has said that would be inconsistent with Libya's progressive system.

He has played a role in opening up Libya's oil and gas fields to international business.
 
So we can sodomy to the rebels list of possible bad things.

Get out line? Well we will stick something in your bum and murder you. Perhaps murder you first though, wouldn't that g spot pleasured before the death
I couldn't hold my laugh in.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X