General AI Crap

I was saying how sex dolls is the only useful application of humanoid robots and then you said that actually the humanoid shape was not the perfect one and that people lack imagination.
I know ;) the app doesn't do italics :)
 
Oooopsie!... 🇺🇸 🤡:p

Editor’s Note: Retraction of article containing fabricated quotations - Ars Technica​

We are reinforcing our editorial standards following this incident.

On Friday afternoon, Ars Technica published an article containing fabricated quotations generated by an AI tool and attributed to a source who did not say them.

That is a serious failure of our standards. Direct quotations must always reflect what a source actually said.

That this happened at Ars is especially distressing. We have covered the risks of overreliance on AI tools for years, and our written policy reflects those concerns.

In this case, fabricated quotations were published in a manner inconsistent with that policy. We have reviewed recent work and have not identified additional issues. At this time, this appears to be an isolated incident.

Ars Technica does not permit the publication of AI-generated material unless it is clearly labeled and presented for demonstration purposes. That rule is not optional, and it was not followed here.

We regret this failure and apologize to our readers. We have also apologized to Mr. Scott Shambaugh, who was falsely quoted.

 

OpenAI might torch $14 billion in 2026, hitting bankruptcy by next year — burning through wads of cash, can it keep its operations afloat?​




Trying to make money any means necessary

"While Altman is trying to move the conversation away from porn and to "erotica" there's no denying that adult entertainment is a big business – the industry is valued at close to $200 billion. With OpenAI projected to lose billions of dollars in 2026 and throughout the rest of the decade, any extra sources of revenue are not going to be ignored, no matter the pushback."

You can short Open AI issue is just funding. The amount of money these companies burn is crazy and I would much rather bet on google that openai

 
ByteDance to curb AI video app after Disney legal threat

Chinese technology giant ByteDance has pledged to curb a controversial artificial intelligence (AI) video-making tool, following threats of legal action from Disney and complaints from other entertainment giants.

In the last few days, videos made using the latest version of the app Seedance have proliferated online. Many have been lauded for their realism.

But the trend has also sparked alarm from several Hollywood studios that have accused the AI platform's makers of copyright infringement.

On Friday, Disney sent a cease-and-desist letter to ByteDance accusing it of supplying Seedance with a "pirated library" of the studio's copyrighted characters, including those from Marvel and Star Wars.

 
ByteDance to curb AI video app after Disney legal threat




Funny when it's fine when AI takes jobs, from ordinary people. But when its rich people jobs and other multi billion dollar companies money.

Then all of the sudden AI bad, costing American jobs and creativity.

"As AI videos become increasingly realistic, concerns extend beyond copyright infringement. Potential job losses, the creation of illegal content, and declines in creativity are also raising alarm. The rapid expansion of data centers is adding further environmental and economic pressures."
 
1771251856544.png
Google has revealed that its AI chatbot Gemini was the target of a large-scale “model extraction” attack, where attackers allegedly sent over 100,000 carefully crafted prompts to reverse-engineer how the system works.

This technique, often called AI distillation, attempts to replicate a model’s behavior by analyzing its responses rather than accessing its source code directly. Google labeled the incident as intellectual property theft, highlighting growing concerns over the security of advanced AI systems.

The company also warned that smaller AI developers may be even more vulnerable, as such attacks require persistence, data collection, and computational resources rather than direct system breaches.

As AI models become more powerful — and more valuable — protecting them from replication and misuse is rapidly becoming a critical challenge for the entire industry.

Source: NBC
 

On a frigid Norwegian afternoon earlier this month, Dan Quintana, a psychology professor at the University of Oslo, decided to stay in and complete a tedious task that he had been putting off for weeks. An editor from a well-known journal in his field had asked him to review a paper that they were considering for publication. It seemed like a straightforward piece of science. Nothing set off any alarm bells, until Quintana looked at the references and saw his own name. The citation of his work looked correct—it contained a plausible title and included authors whom he’d worked with in the past—but the paper it referred to did not exist.

Every day, on Bluesky and LinkedIn, Quintana had seen academics posting about finding these “phantom citations” in scientific papers. (The initial version of the Trump administration’s “MAHA Report” on children’s health, released last spring, contained more than half a dozen of them.) But until Quintana found a fake “Quintana” paper cited in a journal he was refereeing, he’d figured that the problem was limited to publications with lower standards. “When it happens at a journal that you respect, you realize how widespread this problem is,” he told me.
 
Kimi Ai is bascially open source (chinese version) of chat gpt. Many people are building their own ai agents and this basically does it all with a good ux
 
Kimi Ai is bascially open source (chinese version) of chat gpt. Many people are building their own ai agents and this basically does it all with a good ux
Did you see the title of this thread?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X