Global Update

dbnnet · Jun 4, 2004

Here is something all MW users should read:
http://www.wirelessiq.info/content/qa/5.html

"IP Wireless has deployed about 500 sites worldwide"

"IPWireless expects between 250000 and 500000 user
devices with an IPWireless chipset to ship by the
end of 2004 with million plus quantities in 2005"

Bay of Plenty: Signal 46% - SNL 17 - ber 71%

ProAsm · Jun 4, 2004

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Woosh Wireless, the operator in New Zealand that has deployed our network, estimates that they have grabbed 57% of new broadband subscribers within their coverage area with that exact formula.<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">57% - eish, either they are extremely happy clients and they woooosh into the night, else where are they, 3 or 4 posts on the national forum... ???

<hr noshade size="1"><center>MyWireless Stuff
The opinions expressed here are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of my employer</center>

Wireless2 · Jun 4, 2004

It sems asif they also had initial problems, but have sorted them out

ProSam maybe you guys must go over there and learn what to do to fix our problems ??

Wireless2 · Jun 4, 2004

Sorry thats ProAsm

gripen · Jun 4, 2004

honestly, ProAsm, the technology and its implementation has been fine here. Its the peering or the 3rd party bandwidth that is the major source of the current problems. If the upstream was as it should be, everyone would be happy and there would be very few hassles not so?

Basically, it is working as they say it should. ie. Non-LOS broadband over a fairly large distance.

regardtv · Jun 5, 2004

Elo Elo,

A quick question for ProASM : Why are we on the 3 tower setup while other areas on the 6 tower setup... Would the 6 tower setup be more suited to a high density/large uptake population solution ... or am I just smoking MySmokesignal again ..?

R

************************************************************
The views expressed on this site are my own and NOT those of my employer.

Luke7777 · Jun 5, 2004

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Originally posted by regardtv
Would the 6 tower setup be more suited to a high density/large uptake population solution ... or am I just smoking MySmokesignal again ..?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">
The way I understand is that the 3node setup covers horizontal wide and vertical narrow (like a rectangle lying on its long side), in order to get the most coverage in a 6km radius. The 6node covers horizontal narrow and vertical wide. If I take the Menlo tower, I suspect that currently most of the signal passes over me (too close). If this was a 6node tower, the increase in vertical coverage would be a definite benefit. Again, this is my take on it and i could be totally wrong [

]

ProAsm · Jun 5, 2004

Luke is 100% correct - the downside of 6 nodes is licence for 6 frequencies and many more towers.

<hr noshade size="1"><center>MyWireless Stuff
The opinions expressed here are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of my employer</center>

Join the MyBroadband community

Get started

Global Update

dbnnet

Senior Member

ProAsm

Expert Member

Wireless2

Well-Known Member

Wireless2

Well-Known Member

gripen

Expert Member

regardtv

Expert Member

Luke7777

Executive Member

ProAsm

Expert Member