Government's Plan to Kill GP Practices

Tommy3000

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The government is planning to implement a set of legal standards that all GP practices must live up to, which could kill private practice and force you to get state-standard healthcare. Although government claims this is for the sake of the patients, these regulations will make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to run a GP practice.

The Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) will enforce these standards, but they are also making the regulations and they will control the appeals process. In other words, the OHSC will be the judge, jury and executioners of medical doctors in private practice. They will have the right to fine, discipline a doctor, or even shut down a GP practice.

It seems that these regulations are a deliberate attempt to cripple private practitioners and force them to rather embrace the National Health Insurance program (which is government’s long term plan to phase out medical aids and insure everyone on a state healthcare system). Basically, the standards of running a GP practice have been set so high that it will be impossible to run a private GP practice, forcing doctors to run government-sponsored NHI clinics instead.

In a nutshell, here are the biggest potential problems with the regulations (not all problems, just the biggest!):

- It will make the government part of the doctor-patient relationship. The OHSC will have the right to access anyone's medical information upon inspection of a GP practice. This is supposedly in order to make sure the doctor is doing his job, (and more importantly, is writing his notes in the exact format required by this new legislation!), but it means that doctor-patient confidentiality will be transformed to doctor-patient-government confidentiality. Considering the history of abuse of power in our country, both by the old and the new dispensation, this seems like a dangerous thing to let government get away with.

- Turn the entire patient-doctor consultation into a bureaucratic mess. God forbid your doctor does not record your religion and sexual orientation at every visit, and he better damn sign it in black ink with a time and date, and then he must scan it into his electronic records.

- Basically regulate what treatment your GP should give you. The regulations strongly imply that GPs must obey, to the letter, the treatment guidelines as defined by the department of health. Basically, whether you have hypertension, diabetes, or pneumonia, the government wants the treatment to be the same regardless of where you go. So if a GP decides that you as an individual actually need a uniquely tailored treatment according to your needs, he is guilty of a crime. Also, it basically means that your GP will not be allowed to treat you differently than a patient getting care from a state facility - the regulations make it compulsory to treat all patients the same, regardless of whether they go private or state, so GPs will have to give the state standard of treatment.

- Make it extremely easy to sue doctors for relatively minor issues. This might sound great on paper, but if a small number of patients are suing doctors for millions, then doctors will have to pay more insurance, which ends up being charged to the patients, which will make healthcare more expensive for everyone.

- Make it extremely difficult to set up a new practice. The regulations require a GP to own a massive amount of equipment, a lot of which he will never actually use in the day-to-day running of a practice; so a GP will need massive financing to even start a practice, which means he will have to focus on servicing only the rich who can afford the high fees needed to pay the GP the money he needs to buy all that useless equipment.

- Make the doctor take medico-legal responsibility for everything: if a child misses a vaccination appointment, it's the doctor's fault. If a patient doesn't go for an x-ray, it's the doctor's fault. If the patient doesn't go to a specialist, it's the doctor's fault. If the patient doesn't come for his repeat script, it's the doctor’s fault. If the patient fails to return for an annual check-up, it's the doctor's fault. Basically, patients are considered to all be 5 year old children and the doctor takes full responsibility for them and if anything goes wrong, the doctor is at fault. Again, this sounds wonderfully patient friendly, but this is just a bunch of lawsuits waiting to happen. So your GP is going to have to spend time running after patients and getting them to where they need to be instead of focusing on, you know, the actual practice of medicine.

- Make the doctor have to spend an enormous amount of time doing admin work. The regulations force the doctor to have standard operating procedures for absolutely everything - from giving an injection, to appointment systems, to taking a blood pressure, referral to specialist etc. And these regulations have to be regularly updated, and available for inspection at any time to inspectors.

- All doctors must annually be certified in CPR; so if your GP has a medical condition or is just an older person who is not fit to do chest pushes during CPR, he must basically close shop. You will no longer be allowed to be a doctor if you are not fit/healthy enough to do CPR. Nevermind that 99.9% of patients going through GP practices everyday don't need CPR.

These are just some of the many issues these regulations are going to cause. If you are interested in reading the actual document, please find the link to it from my google drive at the bottom of this post.

If you have never heard of the OHCS, they have a FAQ page that summarises their mission:
http://www.ohsc.org.za/index.php/who-we-are/ohsc-faq

The copy of the draft regulations on my google drive:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz_moIVGwjoeazRZY1ZjRW1YTnNDVWZMVGk5UkYtRW05TTlR/view?usp=sharing
 
Im ganna read that that regulating document, but basically your issue is you dont think GPs should be regulated?

Do you see anything here that you would not see in Canadian regulations?
 
Oooh, I liked this one


"Sub-domain 2: Clinical management of national priority health

conditions

Standard 1: The practice must implement systems to ensure that

users are treated in accordance with current evidence based

medicine guidelines to reduce variations in care and improve user

outcomes."
 
No offence, but looking at those basic standards I dont see any of them which are unreasonable. Perhaps quote and paste the standard here you have problem with so we can break them down and compare it to international norms. Yes, some practices will need to up their standards, but I hope my doctor is already complying with most of those!
 
I don't see this when our government recognizes traditional healers.
 
The problem is government meddling, the Canadian government is at least proficient, can you imagine the disaster if private institutions are over regulated.

If anything this looks like communism, nothing near socialist medicine, where the doctor and patients have more of a say
 
"..forcing doctors to run government-sponsored NHI clinics instead."

...or forcing them to leave the country, as many has did. I know two doctors who left for Canada a few years back.
Our local gynecologists has stopped helping pregnant woman and is refering them to doctors in the Cape Town side of the mountain, also thanks to governments medling.
 
Most of these requirements will not pass constitutional standards... and the ANC cannot change the constitution.
These laws will be struck down so fast the ANC's head will be spinning.
 
Government might have a tough time getting the majority of private health sector users to accept these regulations since I agree that it's marketed under the disguise of "best interest of the patient" when it's in fact to get the private sector to fund and comply with their NHI implementation.
 
Users’ rights training includes relevant aspects of local cultural sensitivities.

Guideline: Relevant aspects of local cultural sensitivities will include the cultural norms of the local community that

impact on the delivery of health care, such as the avoidance of certain animal products, a preference to be examined

by health care providers of the same gender as the user, the likelihood of users to consult traditional healers prior to

visiting allopathic practitioners, etc.

What are the witch doctors standards?
 
I dont see anything wrong with a bit of regulating

It's a heck of a lot of regulation. Knowing government you're probably going to fail everything unless you bribe as everything is handled within the department.

Not happy about the part where the investigator can go talk with the patients, they're there to be treated, not to talk with the investigator. Also patient confidentiality.
 
God forbid your doctor does not record your religion and sexual orientation at every visit

Nobody's business, irrelevant info that has little to nothing regarding treatment.

Basically regulate what treatment your GP should give you. The regulations strongly imply that GPs must obey, to the letter, the treatment guidelines as defined by the department of health. Basically, whether you have hypertension, diabetes, or pneumonia, the government wants the treatment to be the same regardless of where you go. So if a GP decides that you as an individual actually need a uniquely tailored treatment according to your needs, he is guilty of a crime. Also, it basically means that your GP will not be allowed to treat you differently than a patient getting care from a state facility - the regulations make it compulsory to treat all patients the same, regardless of whether they go private or state, so GPs will have to give the state standard of treatment.

Scam to push drug X or Y while ignoring alternative drug A, B, or C , removing patients choice.

- Make the doctor take medico-legal responsibility for everything: if a child misses a vaccination appointment, it's the doctor's fault. If a patient doesn't go for an x-ray, it's the doctor's fault. If the patient doesn't go to a specialist, it's the doctor's fault. If the patient doesn't come for his repeat script, it's the doctor’s fault. If the patient fails to return for an annual check-up, it's the doctor's fault. Basically, patients are considered to all be 5 year old children and the doctor takes full responsibility for them and if anything goes wrong, the doctor is at fault. Again, this sounds wonderfully patient friendly, but this is just a bunch of lawsuits waiting to happen. So your GP is going to have to spend time running after patients and getting them to where they need to be instead of focusing on, you know, the actual practice of medicine.

Completely ludicrous, bordering on batcr@p crazy.

Much of this appears to be a fearmongering strategy being run on behalf of government to push an agenda.

And just like in many parts of the world where medicine and medical practices are becoming over regulated it is just going to add to a decline in people entering into the medical fields.
 
...or forcing them to leave the country, as many has did. I know two doctors who left for Canada a few years back.
Our local gynecologists has stopped helping pregnant woman and is refering them to doctors in the Cape Town side of the mountain, also thanks to governments medling.
You sure the gynie wasn't due to high cost of malpractice insurance?
 
Standard 1: The practice must implement systems to ensure that

users are treated in accordance with current evidence based

medicine guidelines to reduce variations in care and improve user

outcomes."

Again I ask you what evidence does the traditional stealers operate under?
 
The government has fvked up and made a fortune out of the insurance industry and the "goal" was never achieved.
Now they starting with the medical industry.

Why not govern yourselves because that it where the most damage is being done to the country and it's people. Once that is sorted direct your idiotic intentions elsewhere.
 
The government has fvked up and made a fortune out of the insurance industry and the "goal" was never achieved.
Now they starting with the medical industry.

Why not govern yourselves because that it where the most damage is being done to the country and it's people. Once that is sorted direct your idiotic intentions elsewhere.
Time for a tax revolt I'd say
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X