Grammar geeks, please help

etienne_marais

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
16,250
Reaction score
19,740
Location
Centurion
In the title of an article: "More than half of working South Africans earns less than R10,000 a month"

Does the subject qualify as a collective noun, hence the verb should be singular and not "earns" ???
 
(Note the incorrect terminology in the second sentence of your original post, which may be confusing - unlike a noun, the plural form of a verb does NOT have an "s")
Firstly I would be loath to classify that as a collective noun - the subject clearly refers to a multitude of persons. Although I am not a native English speaker, the plural form (earn) just "feels right" to me.

That been said:
The way I understand it a collective noun (similar to the above) can still take a plural form if not functioning as a unit, eg:
The team of oxen are scattered over the field, vs:
the team of oxen pulls the cart.
One may therefore also argue that as not everyone earns the same amount, the group does not function as a unit. (I realise I am pushing it here).
 
Last edited:
(Note the incorrect terminology in the second sentence of your original post, which may be confusing - unlike a noun, the plural form of a verb does NOT have an "s")
Firstly I would be loath to classify that as a collective noun - the subject clearly refers to a multitude of persons. Although I am not a native English speaker, the plural form (earn) just "feels right" to me.

That been said:
The way I understand it a collective noun (similar to the above) can still take a plural form if not functioning as a unit, eg:
The team of oxen are scattered over the field, vs:
the team of oxen pulls the cart.
One may therefore also argue that as not everyone earns the same amount, the group does not function as a unit. (I realise I am pushing it here).


It is a single multitude, the team of oxen IS scattered across the field.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X