I played Crysis a month or two ago, and I was forced to use mostly low graphics settings at 1280x1024 but it still looked great.
Now I am busy playing Cod4 and am able to play at pretty much full settings at 1280x1024 except not full AA or AF. (i haven't tried yet, so it could work)
My card is an ATI X850XT, so I was very suprised to be able to play at such high settings in cod4 without any lagging. I only played Crysis at low settings, so I can't imagine what it would look like full, but it already looked great at low.
I thought there games were similiar in terms of graphics requirements? They both looked great at this respective detail settings, except that cod4 had the addition of nicer/more shadows and more particles etc which created by FAR the most realistic sort of was scenes I've ever seen.
Now I am busy playing Cod4 and am able to play at pretty much full settings at 1280x1024 except not full AA or AF. (i haven't tried yet, so it could work)
My card is an ATI X850XT, so I was very suprised to be able to play at such high settings in cod4 without any lagging. I only played Crysis at low settings, so I can't imagine what it would look like full, but it already looked great at low.
I thought there games were similiar in terms of graphics requirements? They both looked great at this respective detail settings, except that cod4 had the addition of nicer/more shadows and more particles etc which created by FAR the most realistic sort of was scenes I've ever seen.