South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yeah, I have. I'm not all too fond of how it was written (I mean the writing style, quite repetitive etc... and this from the Editor in Chief of the African Sun, oh well) but it's still an interesting read....the view of Africa, its people and their lack of productiveness. Lucky for him he is black and can thus say politically incorrect things. I gotsta tan more...might help![]()
Who would buy a book with such a silly provocative title? Perhaps the content is weak, so they have to call it that to get attention.
Who would buy a book with such a silly provocative title? Perhaps the content is weak, so they have to call it that to get attention.
Who are the Caucasians again?Americans bought a lot of them!
I actually bought it. The content is repetitive, provocative and incoherent. Its not an easy book to get through but interesting nonetheless.
In 2005, at BMF conference in jhb, he said something along these lines, in summary:
"We (Blacks) must abandon the belief that whatever is white is better. We must develop ‘devil-may-care’ attitude and the ‘killer-instinct’ of the of the Caucasians and also the spider web mentality of the Asians"
Who are the Caucasians again?
I believe you bought it because you hoped to find a message to black people.
Yet instead of putting it down, you continued to plow through it looking for the message(s).
Who are the Caucasians again?
I believe you bought it because you hoped to find a message to black people. Instead you found it difficult to read and repetitive. Yet instead of putting it down, you continued to plow through it looking for the message(s).![]()
Might explain a few things about whats really happening in our wonderful land .Escom would be a prime example what the author is talking about in this book
Hardly.Really... Talk about scepticism. Sounds like a very personal comment to DLK and pretty much uncalled for. Is there no chance people could disagree without getting personal?![]()
Really... Talk about scepticism. Sounds like a very personal comment to DLK and pretty much uncalled for. Is there no chance people could disagree without getting personal?![]()
Hardly.
My point is that bad books shouldn't survive the readability test even if they have controversial titles. If I wanted write a sensationalist piece of nonsense I would probably call it 'Capitalist Kaff*r' and wait for devotees to find something meaningful in it.
If I wanted write a sensationalist piece of nonsense I would probably call it 'Capitalist Kaff*r' and wait for devotees to find something meaningful in it
You've changed the logic of my whole argument...I don't agree with your point that just because books may have controversial titles.. they should be binned. ...
Okay.. Have you read the book? I'd love to make pronouncements on it but I can't coz... I haven't read the damn thing. If you have.... I may possibly understand your point of view. That being said... I don't agree with your point that just because books may have controversial titles.. they should be binned.
If they're devotees.... you wont' need to have silly & stupid titles like that hey....
Okay.. Have you read the book?