Health & diet

CheekyC

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
515
Reaction score
0
I am reading a fascinating book at the moment. It's called Modernist Cuisine. It is 6 LARGE volumes that takes a very detailed scientific approach to cooking. They have dedicated a large chapter to dietary systems & health. The interesting part is that they show that none of the studies purporting to support the dietary beliefs that we are accustomed to are actually valid. I.e. most studies make invalid conclusions.

For example no study has ever proven MSG to be bad for you.

Dennis Burkitt, an Irish MD, visited middle Africa in the 40's. He found that the indigenous people there had very low occurrances of colorectal cancer. He also observed that they had a high fibre diet and came to the conclusion that high fibre prevents (colorectal cancer). Based on this completely BS conclusion, all the big food corporates started to make these claims on their products as it was not illegal to do so. This is still the case today and obviously they are reluctant to change that. Many subsequent studies have failed to prove that high fibre diet has all the benefits it claims to have.

On the subject of cholesterol, the book goes into a lot of detail. In fact there has been studies that has shown that low cholesterol in over 50's is dangerous.

They also show a timeline of what science has proven vs US government policy. And clearly policy is totally out of whack with scientific fact. Because of food industry lobbying.

The same goes for food safety. Few of the things we take for granted in food safety is actually valid. For example overcooking pork is not necessary. You can cook pork like you do beef. Freezing pork actually kills the bacteria that are harmful to us....


Fascinating book but it's a loooong read...
 
Last edited:
Just be careful offering a link like that - did you pirate the book? I suggest removing the link.

I know that MSG is not harmful - read that a while ago. Its just a salt of glutamate, and plenty of other foods contain glutamates. People overreact.

Regarding pork, I know that the USDA has changed its guidance on how to cook pork safely. They say it does not need to be cooked to 74 degrees C anymore - 68 or so is fine, as long as it is rested. Personally I would never cook pork the way I cook beef, but that is partially because I think pork has a nicer texture when it is well done (not overdone).

Is the whole carbohydrates vs fat thing in there? That is a very interesting topic, also involves the food lobbyists.
 
Just be careful offering a link like that - did you pirate the book? I suggest removing the link.

I know that MSG is not harmful - read that a while ago. Its just a salt of glutamate, and plenty of other foods contain glutamates. People overreact.

Regarding pork, I know that the USDA has changed its guidance on how to cook pork safely. They say it does not need to be cooked to 74 degrees C anymore - 68 or so is fine, as long as it is rested. Personally I would never cook pork the way I cook beef, but that is partially because I think pork has a nicer texture when it is well done (not overdone).

Is the whole carbohydrates vs fat thing in there? That is a very interesting topic, also involves the food lobbyists.

Link removed

Personally I would not eat pork rare like beef but I have had pork just done and it was super

It talk about cholesterol in detail and mentions atkins, etc but I have not finished reading the chapter
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X