Hi all
Not sure exactly where to post this as it overlaps a few forum topic areas, but here goes:
I have client who wishes to create a "streaming home" with older non-smart HDtv's.
They have 100 mb fibre, and up to 4 users will be utlilizing the system at the same time.
They have one newish wifi enabled tv, with a LAN port so I'm happy to give them LAN connection to their main tv in the lounge.
They then have 4 older tv's that they wish to get streaming services to, spread across 100 m2 under roof of their home.
I guess there are two approaches:
Add a 16 port managed switch to the network and then:
1. LAN cable to each TV in each room, then some kind of android streaming device neatly installed and hidden away providing streaming duties. LAN into device, device connected via HDMI, to each HD tv.
Which Android streaming device would you then recommend we deploy, taking into account none of these are 4k or HDR tv sets, so maximum 1080p streaming quality?
Main streaming services they will use will be:
Netflix USA; Youtube, Youtube kids, Showmax. They want to drop dstv entirely.
Could be a total of 12 lan cables running through the house, inlcuding Ip cameras.
or
2. Wireless setup. More aesthetically pleasing, but not quite as reliable as there will also be a multitude of laptops, mobile phones, portable consoles connected to wifi at the same time, which may cause some streaming buffering.
I would install Ubiquiti Unifi AC AP's in this scenario to mitigate some of the downsides.
I would then still need some sort of streaming device (Google Chromecast?) to get the older TV's to become smart tv's.
I have checked and all their other tv's have at least one USB and or HDMI port, but none have LAN ports except the lounge.
In terms of VPN and dynamic ip addresses from their isp, what would be the most idiot-proof way for them to manage their VPN?
Are ExpressVPN and/or Unotelly still considered the gold standards for this type of scenario?
I have not played in that space for a bit, so perhaps there have been some advancements in this area?
I assume scenario 1 would be better from a support, maintenance perspective?
Thoughts and suggestions everyone?
Budget will be based on which approach is chosen.
Not sure exactly where to post this as it overlaps a few forum topic areas, but here goes:
I have client who wishes to create a "streaming home" with older non-smart HDtv's.
They have 100 mb fibre, and up to 4 users will be utlilizing the system at the same time.
They have one newish wifi enabled tv, with a LAN port so I'm happy to give them LAN connection to their main tv in the lounge.
They then have 4 older tv's that they wish to get streaming services to, spread across 100 m2 under roof of their home.
I guess there are two approaches:
Add a 16 port managed switch to the network and then:
1. LAN cable to each TV in each room, then some kind of android streaming device neatly installed and hidden away providing streaming duties. LAN into device, device connected via HDMI, to each HD tv.
Which Android streaming device would you then recommend we deploy, taking into account none of these are 4k or HDR tv sets, so maximum 1080p streaming quality?
Main streaming services they will use will be:
Netflix USA; Youtube, Youtube kids, Showmax. They want to drop dstv entirely.
Could be a total of 12 lan cables running through the house, inlcuding Ip cameras.
or
2. Wireless setup. More aesthetically pleasing, but not quite as reliable as there will also be a multitude of laptops, mobile phones, portable consoles connected to wifi at the same time, which may cause some streaming buffering.
I would install Ubiquiti Unifi AC AP's in this scenario to mitigate some of the downsides.
I would then still need some sort of streaming device (Google Chromecast?) to get the older TV's to become smart tv's.
I have checked and all their other tv's have at least one USB and or HDMI port, but none have LAN ports except the lounge.
In terms of VPN and dynamic ip addresses from their isp, what would be the most idiot-proof way for them to manage their VPN?
Are ExpressVPN and/or Unotelly still considered the gold standards for this type of scenario?
I have not played in that space for a bit, so perhaps there have been some advancements in this area?
I assume scenario 1 would be better from a support, maintenance perspective?
Thoughts and suggestions everyone?
Budget will be based on which approach is chosen.
Last edited: