OK not really sure which section this falls under, and I have seen talk of it on here before, but with all the adverts on TV now what I am wanting to know is how good is it really?
How much of a difference does it make? Now bear in mind I am the type that is quite happy to watch a movie that is compressed to 700Mb without concern for quality. Will I really go "wow" if I see HD?
Also what makes it HD? The decoder? The TV? Both?
HD picture is picture with more detail in it. Standard PAL is at 720by576
pixels. High Definition comes in 1280by720 (720p) and 1920by1080 (1080i or p) flavours
although there are a few offbeat formats such as the old Japanese
1035i format which was analog HD.
As is DSTV will only go up to 1280by720. However BluRay discs, HD-DVDs,
some downloadable content and an older format known as HD-VHS which
was the only way to get HD before the advent of HD-DVD/BluRay disks all
offer full HD.
The HD picture is sharper and can be shown on a much larger screen before
it becomes as blurry as Standard Definition (SD) picture. This is the
chief advantage of HD - getting that cinema big screen effect at home.
So screen sizes play a big role here. It seems that to really benefit
from high definition, you should sit, within 3 heights of your screen,
ie if you have a big screen you can sit further away, if you only
have a 24 inch, you need to sit quite close to it. If you move too
far away, you won't be able to tell the difference between HD
and SD. So you should think about where you'd watch your
HD movie. If in the living room on the sofa, and you
own a big living room, you'll need a BIG set (46 inches
or preferably 60-72) to get the full benefit of HD or
a full HD projector. Those things are expensive.
If you own a small living room, a 32-40 inch monitor may suffice.
If you watch at your pc, a 24 inch and up will suffice too.
To get a quick idea of the difference between HD and SD, if you
have a 2Megapixel and higher camera, take a picture, then
save it as 1920by1080 and subsequently make a copy and save
that as 720by576 pixels. Now compare the two side by side,
note that you can enlarge the bigger picture to your
whole monitor and it stays sharp, while enlarging the smaller
resolution picture to full screen, makes it very soft as lots of
detail is lost.
As for whether you will be wowed by HD it all depends on why you
watch movies. If special effects and detailed scenes wow you,
ie IMAX like movies and sci-fi/action flicks, then HD will probably
wow you, if you have a full HD TV/monitor.
If you're more into substance, then yeah you may still be wowed,
but high resolution will not make up for the script/screenplay/direction/editing and photography of the movie. You may find yourself distracted by
the hair follicles on an actors face instead of focusing
on the film - that may happen too. All in all HD is great but I think
that as someone else said, contrast and saturation are important
and for me at least, the actual content is probably the most important,
after all if I wouldn't watch a soap opera in SD, why would I want to
see it in HD?
Is HD the final deal? Well it isn't. Its the new standard but there are
more advanced standards in the pipeline. For example most
films when shot in digital video get shot in a format called 4K and another
format called 8K also exists. 4K refers to the horizontal number
of lines, and if we know the aspect ratio (widescreen) one can work
out the total number of pixels. Basically with an aspect
ratio of 1.33:1 its 4096 x 3112 pixels. Full HD is just under 2K.
NHK has been developing 8K aka Ultra High Definition TV
7680x4320 pixels apparently looking at a demo screen
was like looking out of the window - the picture actually looks REAL.
Imax runs at 5616x4096.
http://www.nhk.or.jp/digital/en/super_hi/